Still, some better news… Yesterday, Variety shared a happy fact about the future of the show.
Advertisement
The publication said that season four has been given the go-ahead by HBO, and producers hope it’ll come out in 2026.
The news comes after the show’s creator Mike White announced last November that he’d pitched his ideas for a further season.
“Mike, obviously — if he wants to move forward and do the four seasons — he will do the fourth season,” HBO and Max executive Casey Bloys said at the time.
Advertisement
Season four has been confirmed before season three, which is set to hit our screens on February 13, comes out.
We don’t know much about season 4 ― neither writers nor execs have shared where the show, which has previously been shot in Hawaii and Sicily, will be filmed.
Advertisement
But let’s be real ― so long as the Emmy-winning show sticks to its “rich people’s opulent nuttiness” theme, we reckon fans are bound to be satisfied.
Jameela Jamil, an actor and host of body positivity podcast I Weigh, is pretty well-known for sharing her thoughts on the pressures women face to look a certain way.
So perhaps it’s not surprising that she recently wrote an Instagram post about “how weird it’s going to be when soon all women on television look the same but men have so much variety.”
Advertisement
The post said that women are getting “the same nose, the same cheekbones, the same jaw, the same eyes, the same eyebrows, the same eyelids, the same lips and are starting to aim for the same forever age and body.”
This sounds similar to other body positivity advocate’s concerns about “Instagram face,” an identikit appearance a lot of women on social media seem to share.
“Can you imagine a world in which every man feels RESPONSIBLE to have to save up for painful, expensive surgery to look exactly like Cillian Murphy?” she asked.
Though she stresses she respects women’s choice to pick whatever look they like, she asked “how much choice is it when you’re being bombarded with a ‘beauty standard’?”
“I’m jealous that so many men are so embraced and celebrated for what makes them different,” Jameela continued. “I want that for us.”
The actor also said she’s annoyed at the amount of money being made off of women’s insecurities, often by men, adding she noticed the beauty standard narrowing during lockdown.
Advertisement
“Variety is choice. Variety is agency. Variety is freedom,” she shared before a carousel of beauty trend-based images and a picture of Lindsay Lohan’s “done” face.
“100% agree. And why are everyone’s teeth neon white lately?” one commenter wrote.
“My 10-year-old told me I should get Botox on my jaw to look sharper, the other day. I hate social media. It is ruining our kids,” another lamented.
“You’re not alone. This conversation needs to be loud. A new trend every year, cosmetic surgeries are normal now!! It’s so sad thinking women feel pressured to get them to be considered beautiful,” yet another Instagram user opined.
Still, some thought the actor was a little off the mark.
“I feel like this exact conversation was had over 20 years ago and was a way to bash women for what they wanted to do with their bodies,” a comment reads.
“I disagree. I don’t think Kate Winslet looks like Davina McCall. Or that Dawn French or Oti Mabuse look the same,” someone else shared.
Advertisement
Still, most of the comments seem to be in line with a top response, which simply says “PREACH!”.
On its surface, Disney Plus’ new eight-part series “Rivals” is a salacious “bonkbuster” about the feud between two exorbitantly privileged (and horny) British men living in the exclusive British Cotswolds in the 1980s. Set among rolling green hills and wildflower-filled forests that are part of large country estates, it is, as one character quips in the show’s opening minutes, the “prettiest prison I ever saw.”
While “prison” is probably too strong of a word to describe the privileged lives of England’s posh upper crust, it does capture the lack of agency the women in this world feel. The story, an adaptation of Jilly Cooper’s bestselling 1988 novel of the same name, sets itself up to tell the story of Lord Tony Baddingham (David Tennant), who is fighting to renew the contract for his commercial U.K. television network, Corinium, and getting periodically sidetracked by his hatred for former Olympic showjumping champion turned Tory Cabinet minister of sport and womanizing rake Rupert Campbell-Black (Alex Hassell). However, it’s really a show about how women struggle to find power within this world of powerful men.
Advertisement
And sex. The show has so much sex that it makes “Bridgerton” seem practically puritanical. It claims its “bonkbuster” title in its opening seconds as the frame fills with a woman grabbing a man’s bare butt before her hands (and the camera) slide up his back to reveal the always charismatic and tragically handsome Rupert shagging a gossip columnist in the bathroom of an airplane that is about to “go supersonic.”
From the first episode’s memorable moment involving naked tennis (and a full frontal) to almost every scene being about an extramarital affair or conversation about sleeping with someone, the show is both scandalous and entertaining, just like Cooper’s source material.
However, viewers shouldn’t let the titillating trappings of the show deceive them into thinking that’s all there is to the story. While “Rivals” is about people who are “hungry for sex,” it’s more than its most salacious moments. Cooper’s raunchy novels are also known for her wry social commentary, and this adaptation maintains that lens.
“Underneath the fun and the froth and the silliness, there’s a very sharp social satire on British class,” showrunner Dominic Treadwell-Collins told The New York Times. He believes this makes the show relevant. “Everyone in Britain is still obsessed with class,” he said. “And the Americans are obsessed with our obsession with class.”
Advertisement
Personally, I’m obsessed with the way the show weaves together class, gender and race. The tension between the three begins to build when BBC’s star TV journalist, Declan O’Hara (Aidan Turner), accepts Tony’s offer to move to the Cotswolds and take a prime-time slot interviewing people live on Corinium.
Declan accepts the offer because he sees financial gain and creative freedom. But, like everything in life and in “Rivals,” the reality is far more complicated, and Declan and his family’s move to the Cotswolds immediately shakes things up. His career decision has forced his wife, Maud (Victoria Smurfit), and daughters to relocate, and Taggie (Bella MacLean), his 20-year-old daughter, quickly attracts the interest of middle-aged Rupert, whom her still-married mother is also trying to seduce (as is seemingly every other woman).
The complications grow as the narrative explores equally compelling stories about other members of Britain’s upper echelon. Lizzie Vereker (Katherine Parkinson) is a romance writer working on a new steamy novel to escape her loveless marriage to vapid Corinium TV host James Vereker (Oliver Chris) while finding herself drawn to also-married businessman Freddie Jones (Danny Dyer).
There’s a tense workplace affair between Tony and Cameron Cook (Nafessa Williams), the Black American TV producer he brought in to elevate Corinium’s vision and helm Declan’s new show. Outside of these two characters, the world continues to expand, adding layers of complexity with affairs between other neighbors, coworkers, teenage children and enemies.
Advertisement
It would be easy for a show with so many subplots to lose the main story thread, but this is not the case in “Rivals.” Instead, each character and their every interaction adds layers of meaning and complexity to the world.
This achievement is a testament to the careful crafting of a show that could be all too easily dismissed as a “guilty pleasure.” From quippy, dry-humored dialogue to the meaningful facial expressions the camera focuses on in a scene, every part of the show feels intentional and purposeful. This is especially true during sex scenes that use nudity to reveal more about the men than the women — both literally and emotionally.
Overall, I was repeatedly impressed at the way “Rivals” creates a female lens into a male-driven world. From this angle, the men and their political ambitions and machinations look increasingly ridiculous. What grounds this silly, privileged world is the women and the way that they carve out space for themselves when they are supposed to be loyal wives, mothers, daughters and employees.
As Taggie tells Rupert at one point, “Well, maybe I’m fed up with sitting around waiting for my life to happen.” Like Taggie, all the women become increasingly fed up with the men in their lives. As the series progresses, it explores the small ways that they seek autonomy within a society and time period that tries to limit their agency. The particular gender roles they inhabit and the blatant sexism they experience are both specific to the 1980s and also timeless.
What’s most impressive is that the show accomplishes this feat in a fun, frothy way that is a treat to watch. By the end of the final episode, the only complaint I had was that I wanted more.
Advertisement
“Rivals” is the second of the 11 novels in Cooper’s “Rutshire Chronicles” series, so there’s plenty of source material for the series to build upon if it is renewed for a second season. And, based on the multiple cliffhangers at the end, it should be.
US Love Is Blind fans will know that Stephen Richardson’s fallout with fiancee Monica Davis involved scandal, sex, and… a sleep test.
Among other shady behaviour, the most recent episode of American Love Is Blind saw Monica finding sexts to another woman on Stephen’s phone that were sent while he was engaged to her.
Advertisement
He said of the event, “I did make a completely stupid mistake while being drunk at a sleep test with somebody who texted me.”
We don’t know if he was actually doing a sleep test at the time, and his actions were obviously slimy regardless.
But if you’re anything like us, you might be wondering what a sleep test even is ― and it turns out it can be a pretty useful tool (that said, the secret to a truly seamless sleep is a clear conscience).
What’s a sleep test?
According to healthcare provider Cleveland Clinic’s site, a sleep test, or sleep study, is officially known as a polysomnogram.
Advertisement
It’s a “diagnostic test that tracks and records how multiple body systems work while you’re asleep,” they say. It’s used to diagnose sleep disorders.
It tracks things like your heart brain, and respiratory system as you sleep. It can be used to spot things like insomnia, sleepwalking, and sleep paralysis.
Sleep studies are “similar” to an oximetry test, which “involves wearing an oxygen monitor on a finger during sleep and can often be done at home.”
The NHS says these can be helpful if you have signs of sleep apnoea.
When you’re awake, symptoms of sleep apnoea may show up if you:
feel very tired
find it hard to concentrate
have mood swings
have a headache when you wake up.
At night, your partner may notice your:
breathing stopping and starting
making gasping, snorting or choking noises
waking up a lot
loud snoring.
What if I want one of these tests?
If you’re worried about your sleep habits, your doctor may refer you to specialist clinics which can facilitate sleep investigations.
Advertisement
Studies range from heart monitoring options (a respiratory polygraph) to inpatient observation and movement monitors (actigraphy).
Inpatient observations are the “polysomnograms” we mentioned earlier.
For what it’s worth, sleep studies usually ask participants not to drink ahead of the exam, or to only have as much as you usually do.
But it turns out this week’s showstoppers, mouth-watering cornucopia, have a history that’d fit right into the Greek mythology-based Netflix hit.
Advertisement
Also known as a “horn of plenty,” cornucopias symbolise abundance.
They date back to Ancient Greece and originally consisted of a goat’s horn filled with fruits and grain ― and were supposedly once used to conceal a very important guest.
What’s the myth behind cornucopias?
According to Dictionary.com, a Roman retelling of the Greek legends from Ovid says that Hercules wrestled the horn from a river god called Achelous. Nymphs then turned it into a horn of plenty, always brimming with food.
One of those nymphs, Amalthaea, fed her foster child Zeus (Jeff Goldblum to fans of the Netflix show) food from the cornucopia in some Greek myths while he was hiding from his father, Brittanica’s online encyclopedia shared.
A Greek legend goes on to say that Zeus went on to place the horn of plenty along with the rest of the goat among the stars, the encyclopedia adds.
Advertisement
The motif stuck around, becoming part of Ancient Roman myths and even appearing in a 1630 Rubens painting of the goddess Abuntia who was associated with the horn.
Its image is so enduring that we recognise it today, featuring it in movies like The Hunger Games and, apparently, attempting to recreate it in flour on the telly.
And we put it in our Fruit Of The Loom T-shirts! Right?
Some people think they remember seeing the produce-filled horn on the cartoon fruit-bearing label of Fruit Of The Loom T-shirts when they were younger.
I’m one of them, but according to the company, we’re wrong ― the company shared on X that “The Mandela Effect is real, the cornucopia in our logo is not.”
Sounds like something a regretful Zeus would make the brand say after an overzealous Earhtly marketing campaign, but okay…
Advertisement
You can watch The Great British Bake-Off every Tuesday at 8 pm on Channel 4.
If you’ve ever completed a flipbook in the corner of your school copybook, you’ll likely have thought to yourself, “How can animators do this for entire episodes?”
Even given that backgrounds are reused, many animated shows use 24 frames per second ― the thought of drawing enough to last you, say, 30 minutes is enough to make me giddy.
Advertisement
Luckily, both TV writer Michael Jamin (formerly of King Of The Hill and Beavis & Butthead) and animator Butch Hartman (who’s worked on shows like Danny Phantom and The Fairly OddParents) have answers.
Unluckily, however, both their accounts mean I’ll never be able to watch a cartoon in the same way again.
It’s a lonnng time
According to Jamin, he spent about six weeks writing a 30-minute episode of King Of The Hill with his colleagues ― after that, they’d spend a couple of weeks making the episode’s soundtrack.
Animators needed the final cut of the track to ensure their characters’ mouths moved in time.
When those were sent to the animators, he said the storyboard (not the whole animated show ― just the storyboard) took “a month or so.”
Advertisement
A month or two after that, they’d watch an early “animatic” to see how it flowed ― but only “a few months after THAT” would they see the coloured-in version. This was still months before the final edit.
“From beginning to end, when it’s ready to air, it’s about nine months,” he added.
That seems to check out
Hartman agreed, saying Danny Phantom and Fairly OddParents both consisted of two 11-minute animated sections.
In the end, it would take “about ten months to do.”
That’s from conceiving the script to completion, though, he says.
However he adds “it’s sped up now with flash animation to about six months, but that’s about the time.”
But there’s another movie mystery at the other end of your favourite films, too.
If you look closely after the credits have rolled, you’ll see that the copyright credit is often written in Roman numerals, rather than the regular Arabic numerals we’re all used to.
Advertisement
That’s not a copyright thing ― books, for instance, usually use regular numbers.
So, why does that change once a story gets on screen?
Well, part of it has to do with mystery
The “deception theory” of Roman numeral credits suggests that TV and movie studios simply don’t want you to know when their piece of media was first released.
The BBC, for instance, uses the technique. “The convention is not to spell out what year something was made,” the broadcaster wrote on their online news site.
Using Roman numerals means you have to spend a lot of time working out what the date is (or, in the adorable case of this grandmother, Google searching the letters as politely as possible).
Advertisement
That way, you couldn’t tell the age of repeats or older content.
ABC’s 33 WYTV says there’s also the “why change?” theory ― in other words, TV shows and movies have used Roman numerals for their copyright credits for so long that it just feels pointless to change it.
They also suggest that it could have something to do with physical film ― back in the day, numbers could fade into unreadable forms on physical tape, but Roman numerals held their shape better over time.
Either way, people don’t love it
Researching the reason for the numerals resulted in my seeing many, many disgruntled forum users who hate the quirk.
One Mumsnet member wrote, “it can be frustrating to wait for the credits to roll, only to find that the date appears as a row of Roman numerals which often flash by too quickly to convert them into Arabic (‘ordinary’) numerals.”
A Guardian reader reckoned the technique is used because “most of the audience (unlike Guardian readers of course) will be unable to read them and so will not realise that the film is so old”.
Advertisement
“I’d bet my non-existent house that most people in the UK can definitely NOT read Roman numerals,” a Digital Spy forum member opined.
Whatever the reason, though, I sort of agree with another Digital Spy forum user ― “it looks cool,” they commented.
We’ve written before at HuffPost UK about how forecasters know where to point on green screens when announcing the weather.
We’ve even shared how actors manage to look so, well, dead while playing corpses; so you’d think we’d be pretty familiar with Hollywood magic by now.
Advertisement
But it never even occurred to me ― until now, at least ― to ask how lemons on TV look so darn juicy.
It took a TikTok from director and filmmaker David Ma, who shoots commercials and movies alike, to realise that what I’d been seeing on-screen had been a scam all along.
“This is the trick to getting the perfect squeeze,” he captioned his video, revealing a slow-mo shot of the artificially juiced-up citrus splashing its droplets of lies over some broccoli.
I knew stars tended to use more injectables than we think, but I wasn’t aware the procedure extended to their dinner.
Advertisement
Other sneaky food-filming tricks include placing a water-soaked, microwaved tampon behind a bowl of food to create the illusion of a steaming meal and using acrylic ice cubes (which don’t melt) for cold drink campaigns.
Meanwhile, most on-screen “ice cream” is basically a form of buttercream made from vegetable shortening, corn syrup, and icing sugar.
Oh, and that “frost” on the glass of beer in adverts? Yeah, that’s more than likely aerosol deodorant sprayed onto the container to give the illusion of cold condensation.
Don’t even get me started on poultry in adverts, which is usually so raw it’s bloody on the inside (!!) and brushed with dish soap to get that perfect glisten.
People had *thoughts* in the comments
“Here I’ve been thinking I had all dry lemons for the last 10 years,” one commenter wrote.
But what about when they have to fake throwing up ― especially if it’s a closeup?
Sure, there’s the tried and tested ”‘puking’ into a bag” method. But for those full-throated, chum-bucket scenes that make us feel queasy ourselves ― yeah, for that you’re going to need some disgusting goop and a way to, err, expel it.
Advertisement
How’s fake vomit made?
Speaking to Movie Insider, special effects artists at NYSPFX revealed their recipe for vomit changes according to the scene ― thicker, gloopier vomit “used a combination of potato leek and split pea soup.”
But you can also add things like noodles for “squiggly” bits as well as frozen berries and tomato paste.
These are then “thrown up” via a pump ― and because the pumps are “made for liquid, not vomit, thick, pasty, substances,″ the Movie Insider interview revealed.
So, they place the thicker substances at the top of the tube ― so that the thinner liquid acts as a “propellant” to push it out.
Advertisement
What’s that about a tube?
You might have noticed that the goriest on-screen vomit scenes are usually shot in profile.
That’s because the end of the tube is sometimes taped to one side of an actor’s face for added realism ― other scenes sneak the tube up an actor’s sleeve and tape it to their wrist, so they can fake vomit while pretending to cover their mouths.
For true puke purists, though, it can get gorier.
Speaking on Hot Ones, Sydney Sweeney revealed that during her Euphoria hot tub throw-up scene, “They had to get a pump, and they had this pipe that they just taped and hid on my body. And then they CGI’d it out up my neck and then there was a horse bit that I had to put in my mouth. So during that scene, they’re filling my mouth with throw up.”
She added, “And then I opened my mouth, and it just started shooting out my mouth. It was the most disgusting thing I ever experienced.”
It doesn’t matter whether you’re into soaps, gore, rom-coms, or dramas; rare is the telly lover who’s managed to avoid seeing the on-screen death of their favourite character.
And if you’ve watched a show with a particularly high character kill-off rate, like Game of Thrones, you’ve likely witnessed post-battle scenes that’d make Napoleon feel queasy.
Advertisement
But once you’ve got past why your beloved character has gone to Hollywood Heaven, the question of just how actors manage to lay so convincingly still for so long during the corpse shots comes up.
Luckily, Marina Hyde, co-host of behind-the-scenes podcast The Rest Is Entertainment, has answers for us.
Which are?
Marina spoke to a producer about forensic pathology prior to the podcast and learned that yep, people do cast corpses.
She explained that “some people do freak out” when playing corpses, and not everyone can lay still enough for long enough to get a good shot, “so you have to audition [for corpse roles] by lying still.”
Advertisement
Ever with perfect corpse casting, though, shots used to not linger on the chest because it’s very hard not to show the rise and fall of breath.
“But now ― this is like one of the big routine instances of VFX ― they can capture it at rest (the chest) at one moment, then they layer that still in the rest of the footage.
“For those ones where there’s an open-eye corpse, the VFX is particularly useful,” Marina added.
Her co-host Richard Osman said, “Essentially there are some actors who are very very good at being still, and now they cheat the ‘not breathing’ elements.”
Woah.
I know! A Reddit thread asking people who had played dead on-screen to share their experiences also provides some gory insight.
“I was on an episode of Chicago Fire as a featured extra. I was in a rubble scene after a marathon bombing,” site user Citrous_Oyster wrote.
Advertisement
“The camera was on a crane facing down on the file and I was laying on my back across the rubble. I was instructed to try and hold my breath as long as I could or take short breaths. I was in a yellow jacket so it also hid some of my breathing which helped,” they shared.
“I work in post-production and can confirm I have removed breaths from actors playing dead. Not particularly complicated generally,” Redditor Jewel-jones added.