Pop star and first-time actor Dua Lipa is entering the world of Barbie with a bang.
The three-time Grammy winner turned up at the premiere of the Barbie film in Los Angeles on Sunday wearing a sheer Bottega Veneta gown that appeared to be constructed out of chain mail. (NSFW images below.)
Advertisement
Lipa wore only a thong under the floor-length dress, which was completely see-through.
She accessorized her look in a pair of silver rocket mules, also by Bottega Veneta, as well as Tiffany’s jewelry.
Lipa appeared to be channeling her character from the movie, which stars Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling. She makes her big-screen acting debut with a small role as Mermaid Barbie.
Advertisement
From the sounds of it, “Barbie” will be the first of many Hollywood projects for Lipa. In fact, she’s already booked a follow-up role in Argylle, a spy thriller starring Henry Cavill and Bryce Dallas Howard.
That isn’t to say she’s abandoning her musical pursuits, as her latest single, Dance the Night, is featured on the Barbie soundtrack.
Speaking to Dazed last month, Lipa said she was eager to work with Barbie director Greta Gerwig, whose films “never really feel like the male gaze. They have very interesting female protagonists”.
Advertisement
“The film ― and there’s a lot of diversity in the cast ― is touching exactly on the buttons that maybe it presses, and shows a different story,” she said. As for the soundtrack, she added: “Greta said that the whole film was inspired by disco. There’s a lot of very glittery and pop moments in it.”
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
Brenda’s foray into the fashion sector with her new range, Be U By Brenda Edwards, is perfectly timed as spring is just around the corner, so shoppers can revamp their wardrobe in time for the warmer months and any upcoming holidays.
Advertisement
The 53-year-old singer and presenter previously worked with the video commerce retailer to curate her own edit back in 2022.
Speaking about the inspiration behind her latest venture, Brenda said: “In the Be U collection you can expect lots of bold beautiful prints, lovely bright colours and clothes that are designed to make you feel as good in yourself as you will look wearing them.
“I want women to feel that they can be adventurous with their clothing and not restrict themselves. The clothing in my collection isn’t restrictive either and it works with any shape/size.
Advertisement
“I want everyone to be confident in their bodies and know that they look good while also feeling comfortable in what they’re wearing. I put a lot of myself into this range, so when you wear it I want you to feel like you can Be U.”
Brenda was keen to launch a spring/summer capsule because she believes it is the perfect time to inject colour into your wardrobe, be playful with prints, which she has designed herself, and fabrics.
She continued: “I love spring because you can really experiment with colour and vibrant prints. In the collection we have used lightweight materials that will blow in the spring air and put a spring in your step.
“I’ve learnt a lot about how much work goes into the material and colour choices, and even the process of making my own prints. I was surprised to learn that different types of materials are better for different things, with certain materials make some designs look totally different. This collection has been two years in the making so the lead in time was also a huge surprise.”
Advertisement
Brenda is excited to see her creations come to life with shoppers wearing her designs – but not as excited as we are to wear them.
“I can’t wait to see lots of ladies walking down the street wearing clothes from my collection”, she shared.
Brenda added: “It will be great to continue working on the range and I’m looking forward to getting feedback from the customer so that the collection can keep growing and evolving with the customer at the heart.”
Brenda’s Be U collection is super inclusive, as the garments come in a range of sizes, from extra small to 4XL, to suit every body shape and occasion.
Advertisement
The range – including clothing, jewellery items and other accessories – are vibrant, bold, super flattering, versatile and affordable.
The 16-piece collection features leather jackets, bright blazers, patterned co-ords and easy-to-wear jumpsuits, which are Brenda’s “number one, go-to item”.
Brenda’s clothing creations are made from lightweight fabrics, which are breathable, yet not restrictive, and perfect to see wearers through the warmer seasons.
The Be U jewellery items vary from gold to silver creations, and span across stone bangles, rings to pendants, as well as hoop earrings, and pendant necklaces, which you can stack, or wear solo to jazz up any outfit.
Advertisement
Whether you are looking to give your wardrobe a complete overhaul, invest in one statement piece to give your closet a new lease of life, or an accessory to complete your favourite outfit, there is something for everyone.
At its best, fashion is subjective, and anything and everything goes. One can argue that in 2022, people did their own thing more than ever before.
Still, some of the most compelling fashion criticism comes in the form of the worst dressed list – a franchise coined by the critic Richard Blackwell. There’s value in curating a “worst dressed list,” not to ridicule, but rather as a barometer of our time, and to gauge what’s working for us (and what’s not) when it comes to pop culture.
Advertisement
It should be noted Blackwell also published a list of “Fabulous Fashion Independents” which was frequently populated by those he deemed “worst dressed.” Some would argue that you’re not really considered cool until you’ve graced the worst dressed list.
In this spirit, HuffPost curated the 10 worst fashion trends of 2022, and we tapped stylists to explain why these looks just didn’t work for us.
Meet the critics
Beverly Osemwenkhae is a New York- and London-based style expert and the founder of ProjectBee Wardrobe Consulting. Her company services are uniquely designed to build individual images and develop personal style.
Chelsea Volpe is a Manhattan-based fashion and still life stylist, known for her idiosyncratic combination of vibrant color and imagery. Clients include Bloomingdale’s, Estée Lauder, Highsnobiety, Hypebeast, Paper Magazine, Vogue and Women’s Wear Daily.
Advertisement
1. Sunglasses at night
“The number of 20-somethings I’ve seen bopping around the New York night scene in ultra luxe sunnies is astounding,” Volpe tells HuffPost. “Is the darkness not dark enough for you? It is not chic, or frankly practical, to wear a pair of Balenciaga sunglasses to your local Bushwick dive bar, darlings.”
2. The Y2K aesthetic
Osemwenkhae is not a fan of glitter, hearts or butterflies when it comes to dressing. “There’s a few things that should stay in the early 2000s like the Y2K aesthetic. Yes, there’s a cool factor that this trend stems from millennium pop culture, but there’s nothing flattering about dressing like a Bratz doll unless you’re under 21.”
3. Floral dresses a la Coastal Grandmother
Advertisement
The coastal grandmother look had a moment this summer, but Volpe found the barrage of floral patterns completely basic, and not in a good way. “Wearing your grandma’s bathroom wallpaper in dress form is so dated. Let’s swap the archaic Nantucket floral print for something more interesting shall we?” She suggests, instead, opting for solids.
4. Low-rise jeans
Low-rise jeans made a comeback this year, but why? “Low-rise jeans highlight the wrong parts of your body,” Osemwenkhae notes. Showing butt-cleavage or a cheeky thong is not, she argued, empowering.Of course style is subjective, and so are the feelings of empowerment associated with it.But to Osemwenkhae’s point, the first time this trend saw popularity in the aughts, it had shock value associated with it. Twenty years later, showing your thong trend feels a little empty, statement-wise.
5. Cargo pants
Another pant faux-pas that made waves in 2022 was the prevalence of cargo pants, which cast, in Volpe’s opinion, a silhouette that looks untailored. “Wearing cargo pants the size of a parachute isn’t cute. When your pants look like two garbage bags merged into one tragic nightmare, it’s an issue.”
Advertisement
6. Platform flip-flops
This isn’t the first time we’ve seen the rise of platforms in footwear – the style has lingered since the 1970s. In the 1990s we saw platforms on everything, from Mary Janes to sneakers, but the most offensive, according to Osemwenkhae, is the platform flip-flop, which returned in 2022. She tells HuffPost she found the trend “a little bulky and heavy on the foot,” and adds when styling resort wear this winter, opt for something more tasteful.
7. Brands that don’t take accountability
Conscious consumerism has been a mainstay of Gen Z, quick to use buying choices to let brands know when they do something uncool, or worse, offensive and inhumane. “Wearing a walking billboard for antisemitism is not fashion forward, loves. Tsk, tsk, Adidas for being complacent with the Kanye fiasco.” Here, Volpe references the outrage people felt over why it took Adidas so long to sever ties with Kanye West, following a barrage of hate speech and antisemitic remarks. She added that “major name brands need to take accountability.” This December, Balenciaga released two campaigns that prompted allegations of the brand condoning child exploitation. TikTokers reacted by destroying Balenciaga goods in their feed.
8. Micro mini skirts
Advertisement
How short is too short when it comes to minis? For Osemwenkhae, it’s all about wearability. “There’s a cutoff point where it’s so mini that it’s impractical to wear.” She says she’s ready to retire the mini and bring back slip midi skirts instead.
9. Lingerie as evening wear
After two years of lockdown loungewear, Volpe notes, “it’s so easy to throw on a sexy corset top or slinky barely there negligee for a night out.” But according to her, lingerie belongs in the bedroom, and evening wear needs to have a little more substance in 2023.
10. Skinny jeans
Painted-on pants are passé. Osemwenkhae notes it’s time to trade in your skinny jeans for a pair of “relaxed straight jeans. It’s a style that’s easy to wear and really flatters the body.” She adds that this fit is “proportionally appealing, especially for a pear shape.”
Hard to believe it’s been two years since Topshop closed its doors on the high street, but we’re still trying to understand what happened to one of the most iconic brands in British fashion history.
For a generation of women, Topshop was the place to shop, a position sealed by the likes of Kate Moss, Beyoncé, Cara Delevingne, Adwoa Aboah and Gigi Hadid, who all worked with the brand.
Advertisement
Yet by 2020, its high street reign ended when Phillip Green’s Arcadia group, which also owns Miss Selfridge, Burton and Dorothy Perkins, collapsed into administration.
It was bought up by Asos in February 2021, where it now sells online, but it’s nothing on the heyday of its flagship stores, including its 100,000 sq ft Oxford Circus mecca in London.
Now, a BBC documentary, Trouble at Topshop, tells the story of its rise and fall – shedding new light on what happened behind the scenes.
“This is a story of a group of women who led a fashion revolution. And it’s the story of a man who’s retail empire would make him king of the high street,” we’re told.
Advertisement
“When their world’s collided, there would be a battle for the soul of Topshop.”
The two-part series details Topshop’s biggest controversies – from questions over Green’s tax record to his treatment of employees – all of which have been well documented, though make for fascinating viewing. But along the way, we also learn some lesson-known facts about the brand we worshipped as teens.
Think you knew Topshop? Here are a few snippets from the doc that surprised us.
Topshop was seriously uncool
You probably associate Topshop with the noughties, but the brand (originally Top Shop) was actually founded in Sheffield in 1964 as a ‘youth store’. And by the 80s, when Jane Shepherdson joined the brand as an assistant buyer, it was a “dated retailer for teens”.
“When I took the job at Top Shop I thought: ’Well, this is a bit embarrassing, because it’s Top Shop. It’s a bit naff!” she says in the show.
Burton and Dorothy Perkins were the “cash cows” of the retail group at the time, and Shepherdson recalls: “We didn’t get a huge amount of attention at the time, we were left to get on with it really.”
But thanks to her smart eye, Shepherdson started repositioning Topshop in the market and increasing profits – long before Phillip Green came along.
Advertisement
Women led the fashion revolution
Phillip Green may be the household name, but a team of women led by Shepherdson (who became brand director in 2007), Caren Downie (buying director 1998-2008) and Jenny Garcia (head of buying 2011-2019) created the Topshop look adored by millions.
Until Shepherdson took over, the clothes and marketing were created for the male gaze, says Downie. But she shook up the market by prioritising looks women wanted to buy with their own money – for themselves, not for their husbands.
“Because we were all women and we knew what we wanted to wear – and we knew how it should feel and how it would make us feel – we were able to kind of drive it forward in a completely different way,” Downie says.
Shepherdson would sign off all collections, with outfit options shared in front of a panel – “it was quite Anna Wintour-ish and reminiscent of Vogue,” says Garcia.
But in 2002, Phillip Green’s acquisition meant a shakeup of the business, which was controversial from the off.
Advertisement
“When we heard we were being bought out, there was a whole [sigh] around the office, and a feeling of: ‘Really? What on earth is that going to be like?’” recalls Garcia.
A shoutout for Radio Top Shop
Green’s methods may have been controversial, but he did know how to increase profits – in the early days, at least. And as the brand grew, so did the popularity of its flagship store on London’s Oxford Street. If you visited it in its heyday, you’ll probably remember the DJs positioned by the front door.
But did you know that long before the in-store parties, the brand had its own radio station? Radio Top Shop, which became Fashion FM, launched in 1982 before it eventually closed down. It played in Topshop stores, even launching the career of BBC Radio 1′s Chris Moyles.
The flagship store also did a turn as a gig venue, with wannabe pop acts performing live next to the clothes.
Advertisement
Topshop wasn’t quite as quintessentially British as you’d think
Topshop marketed itself as the home of Brit-cool fashion, with London very much at its centre. But Garcia reveals the team travelled all around the world to find inspiration for their collections, taking “thousands and thousands of photos” of people on the “fringes” of the fashion scene in streets, clubs, shops, markets – you name it.
Although we associate the brand with British youth culture, it’s actually one of the few British fashion houses that’s broken America. And at its height, Topshop had stores in 40 countries worldwide.
It brought the high street to London Fashion Week
In 2005, Topshop took to the catwalk at London fashion week – something no other high street brand had done. If you were a tween or teen at the time, this game-changing show may have evaded your attention, but it almost definitely influenced the clothes you bought over the next five years.
Topshop was suddenly associated with models – catapulting its reputation to a whole new level – and within months, Phillip Green’s empire was estimated by the Sunday Times rich list to be worth £3bn.
That Kate Moss collab almost didn’t happen
Advertisement
Kate Moss launched her first collection for Topshop in 2007 and within its first week, it made around £3m. But it almost didn’t happen. In the documentary, we learn that Green met Moss by chance at a party.
″[It was] by pure luck that I found her, it wasn’t a plan,” he says in interview footage from 2013. “It was just one of those instinctive moments. She said ‘why don’t we do some business?’ and I said ‘well, come and see me.’”
The collection may have been a hit with customers, but papers at the time claimed it contributed towards Shepherdson’s resignation. In the documentary, she says the collection with Moss was a good idea – but hints at tensions mounting behind the scenes regarding how business decisions were made.
You’ll have to watch the documentary for the full details, but what’s clear is without Shepherdson at the helm, Topshop was never the same again.
Trouble at Topshop airs on BBC Two at 9pm on Monday September 26 and on iPlayer
This collaboration sees the reality TV star release a new line Boohoo, which will include two 46-piece limited edition collections, the first of which will be showcased during New York Fashion Week on September 13.
Advertisement
This comes hot on the kitten heels of news that Pretty Little Thing – the fast fashion brand that’s also owned by Boohoo – has introduced an app encouraging shoppers to buy and sell second hand clothes.
Kourtney’s first Boohoo line – set to launch in the US market – ranges in price from $6 to $100 and will include items made with recycled polyester and recycled cotton, as well as two vintage-style biker jackets.
“When Boohoo first approached me to collaborate on a line, I was concerned about the effects of the fast-fashion industry on our planet,” Kourtney, 43, told WWD in an interview about the line.
“I’m grateful for the opportunity to use my platform to drive conversations that lead to ongoing change and use my voice to share actionable tips with consumers on how we can play our own part.”
Advertisement
Social media seems less than impressed by news of the collaboration, however. Echoing criticism of Pretty Little Thing’s marketplace, Boohoo’s latest announcement has been labelled by some as an act of greenwashing.
People have also queried Kardashian’s involvement, given her penchant for a private jet or two, and her family’s reputation for excess.
Boohoo’s business model is famously based on fast turnaround to meet and stoke demand, with more than 3,000 new styles added weekly to its site and some items taking just 48 hours to go on sale from idea to manufacture.
In July, the UK Competition and Markets Authority opened an investigation into whether eco-friendly claims made by various UK fast fashion chains added up – Boohoo is one of the brands under investigation, alongside Asos and Asda.
It was also hit by scandal mid-pandemic in 2020, when a series of newspaper investigations alleged that some UK workers producing clothes for Boohoo in factories in Leicester were being paid below minimum wage and working in non-Covid safe environments.
Advertisement
This led the company to severing ties with various UK suppliers, and some of its shareholders voting against big payouts for top Boohoo executives.
It’s hardly surprising, perhaps, that people have taken issue with this new collab on social media.
Kourtney isn’t exactly the most sustainable celebrity
Boohoo has hired Kourtney Kardashian as a green guru ambassador & to question whether “style and sustainability can eve mr go together”. Interesting move for a fast fashion firm still recovering from Leicester scandal & a member of a family that’s sold mass consumption pic.twitter.com/Fsoapa3Sxa
big big fast fashion conglomerate suddenly creating sustainability lines and schemes is bare cheeky. and then to appoint a kardashian as an ambassador?? that’s brazen https://t.co/nzTwypWWgJ
Fast fashion and sustainability don’t really go together
Kourtney Kardashian collab with Boohoo is not what I was expecting at all!!!! Even if it is sustainable, it’s still fast fashion and something I didn’t think she’d believe in?
A private-jetting Kardashian worth $65 million is now “sustainability ambassador” for fossil fuel fashion brand boohoo, where she’ll chat “with sustainability experts to better understand challenges and opportunities in the fashion industry.” We absolutely KANNOT. pic.twitter.com/cmI8zwB3ui
And what about the garment makers behind the new line?
Not Kourtney Kardashian releasing a “sustainable” line with boohoo, girl you have money you can turn down an offer from them and work with a brand that genuinely promotes slow fashion AND pays their garment workers ✌🏽✌🏽
Items are priced starting at $6 !! Sorry Kourtney their is no way to make a new sustainable garment to retail at $6. Sustainable means fair and honest wages for garment workers, for farmers growing the material for the fibres, or the factory worker reconstituting recycled fibre https://t.co/0EtI6PJcQn
When we reached out to Boohoo, Cheryl Chung, head of communications for the brand, responded.
“We recognise that working with Kourney is a choice a lot of people will find unusual,” she told HuffPost UK.
“Kourtney has faced a lot of criticism about her own sustainability practices. But we’re talking to a lot of sustainability experts as part of this project.”
Chung emphasised Kourtney’s huge following on Instagram –196 million followers at last count – to explain that hiring her in an ambassadorial role could influence a larger number of people to learn more about sustainability.
The brand is releasing her conversations with experts as a docuseries, available to view on YouTube.Those experts include Tim Nelson, the CEO of Hope For Justice, which works on freeing people from modern slavery around the world.
Advertisement
“We’re working with her and tackling conversations around the challenges of textile waste, the challenges of worker welfare, and how you responsibly deal with your clothes at the end of their life,” Chung said, adding that Kourtney’s conversations about massive challenges facing the fashion industry was “the most important part of the collaboration”.
Asked whether the venture was another example of greenwashing, Chung responded that in-house designers working on Kardashian’s line are concentrating on using fabrics and materials that wouldn’t harm the environment, but didn’t speak to further supply chain logistics.
“We’re not claiming to be perfect in any way but we’re categorically trying to do our best to be as honest and open and transparent,” she added.
There’s a new Zara dress that’s gone viral and we’re back to playing our favourite fashion game: spotting it in the wild.
First, there was That Coat – a patterned number first produced by Zara in 2016 that inspired its own Instagram account. But soon, it had a rival.
Advertisement
The Dress – the black and white polka dot midi – became unavoidable during pre-pandemic 2019, with hype on yet-unseen levels. Women wore it to brunch, to baby showers and even to their own weddings. It too inspired its very own Instagram account, not to mention countless newspaper articles.
This year on TikTok, younger women said enough of these shapeless, floaty numbers and the Pink Slip Dress became the outfit du jour (#ZaraPinkDress has gained more than 9.7million views since the spring).
But this summer, there’s another mini patterned dress that women can’t get enough of. Because say what you want about Zara, the brand knows how to create designs with unrivalled mass appeal.
Advertisement
The latest viral dress, retailing at £32.99, comes in a variety of patterns and colours, but the pink and green paisley versions seem to be most popular.
On TikTok, user Sarah Gledhill shared a funny video counting the dresses at York Races.
The video has been liked more than 31,000 times and in the comments, others have been joking about seeing the dress everywhere, too.
“This has made my day,” one person said. “I’ve literally been sending my sister photos around London this last week every time I see this dress. It’s become a game.”
Another added: “Just seen two girls where that dress for at a hen do I went to yesterday.”
And a third joked: “Not me sat here at a staff event in the pink one.”
The dress has even found celeb fans, with Eddie Izzard snapped wearing it on the way to the airport.
Advertisement
And over on Instagram, you don’t have to scroll for long before you’ll find women rocking the look.
Advertisement
We’re yet to spot an Instagram account dedicated to this year’s new It Dress, but just give it time.
And until then, if you’ve nabbed one yourself, we salute you. You’ve clearly got excellent taste.
For the first time ever, Love Island has partnered with eBay in a bid to promote sustainable fashion. This season, islanders are wearing second-hand clothes, with a shared wardrobe situated in the new villa.
The new move highlights a tone shift for the show, considering it previously partnered with I Saw It First and alumni have gone on to be brand ambassadors for the likes of Boohoo, Pretty Little Thing and Asos.
Advertisement
The collaboration comes as research from eBay highlights that UK shoppers are becoming increasingly aware of fast fashion. A fifth (20%) of Brits say they buy more second-hand fashion compared to two years ago and on average, they reckon 16% of their wardrobes are made up of pre-loved clothes.
If done right, the partnership could really be a game-changer. Love Island is big business in the world of fashion, with online fashion sales growing by more than a tenth while the reality show ran last summer.
Advertisement
Though we’re all for sustainable fashion in theory, viewers have mixed opinions about the outfits this year. While some people are loving the eco-conscious clothes, others aren’t too impressed.
For me, it seems like the contestants don’t seem to have a sense of personal style compared to contestants from earlier seasons. Could this because they’re wearing clothes they don’t like?
Advertisement
Here’s what the public think about the new looks.
Some people think the outfits don’t look great
I’m sorry but they shouldn’t do eBay next season, the outfits are not giving at all #Loveisland
switching to ebay/recycled clothing was a shout, the girls outfits bang #loveisland
— Soraya Bouazzaoui (@halalltakeaway) June 6, 2022
very impressed with everyone’s wardrobes to say that everything is pre-loved from @eBay. they smashed it 👏🏽 can’t even tell it’s not Boohoo lol 👏🏽 #loveisland
Though the show promotes sustainability, some have pointed out that the adverts don’t
Advertisement
Also what was the point of love island announcing they’ve decided to pair up with Ebay to be sustainable, if all their ads are gonna be sponsored by Shein anyway?????
— Jessica Ní Dhaltúin (@j_nidhaltuin) June 7, 2022
love island need to figure out if they’re trying to be sustainable or not, upcycled chairs but shein advertisements???? hahahaha
Fast fashion brand Shein has found itself accused of duplicating designs from the popular high street clothes shop Zara.
Users on TikTok particularly have pointed out the similarities between dozens of designs from both brands, with #ZaravsShein reaching 34.6 million views and #ZaraDupe hitting 40 million.
Advertisement
This isn’t the first time Shein has been called out for copying designs. Brands such as Levi Strauss, AirWair International (producer of Dr Marten boots) and Ralph Lauren have already taken legal action against the brand over alleged copyright infringement.
In the past, Zara has separately been accused by independent designers of copying designs, leading to some items being taken off shelves.
Advertisement
In response to the latest comparisons, a Shein spokesperson told the Guardian: “Shein suppliers are required to comply with the company’s code of conduct and certify their products do not infringe on third-party IP.”
HuffPost UK has also contacted the brand for comment.
Advertisement
The items in question have received mixed reviews on TikTok. While some shoppers are raving about their bargain buys, others are warning that fast fashion will “destroy the planet”. As one TikTokker points out, Zara is still considered a fast fashion brand, despite its higher price point to Shein.
Zara is part of the Inditex Group, whose brands include Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius and Oysho. As the sustainable fashion index Good On You highlights, Zara’s business model is based on an incredibly high turnover of the latest fashion items.
So what does it say about fast fashion if brands are pinching designs from each other?
Michaela Leitz, a 28-year old fashion stylist and influencer from Germany, thinks copycat fashion fundamentally diminishes a brand’s identity and creativity.
Advertisement
“Shein is known for creating 700 to 1000 new designs a day. It’s not a creative process – you can’t even do that if you have a huge team of designers,” she tells HuffPost UK.
“And because they’re producing at that rate the clothes are usually bad quality. So after two or three washes your clothes are already falling part, which is destroying our planet because the clothes aren’t decaying.”
Shein is known for its cheap price point, which is why the brand has such a huge appeal to young people. So much so, the company’s revenue has quadrupled since 2019, according to the Business of Fashion website, with sales rising from $15.7bn (£12.1bn) to a huge $100bn.
But even though Zara has pricier items, its retail model tells a different story.
“Zara produces 52 sub-seasons a year whereas high quality designer brands have two main seasons a year, so it’s still a fast fashion brand,” Leitz says. That’s despite the fact, she adds, that “you’re able to go into a Zara store and see the designs [and] it feels more luxurious than Shein.”
When fast fashion brands start stocking similar designs, Leitz says it feeds into “micro trends” – which are bad news for the planet and your fashion sense.
Micro trends are when a fashion item or aesthetic become really popular quickly, but goes out of style equally quickly,. While macro trends can last from five to 10 years, micro trends can last as little as three – or an even shorter timeframe.
“Micro trends don’t allow you to have your own signature style,” says Leitz. “As a consumer you just keep buying all these clothes that you won’t wear again. Which is of course really bad for the environment.”
For Leitz, the Zara vs Shein hashtag highlights how fashion is losing its meaning. “Fashion is self-expression for clothing, it’s storytelling and showing who you are. These brands aren’t original in my opinion,” she says.
Leitz believes fast fashion dupes take away from creativity and individualism. “We’re seeing brands creating 700 designs today. There’s no innovation, so where does fashion go from here if brands are just copying each other?”
Advertisement
However, boycotting fast fashion brands is harder said than done. If you’re someone on a low income it can be challenging to shop sustainably, and for some people, there are added barriers.
“I specialise in plus-size fashion so I know how hard it is find clothes and understand that not everyone can afford the expensive price points,” Leitz says.
“When I was in my early 20s I also didn’t have the funds to shop at expensive brands but I recommend trying to shop vintage. Or save up some money and buy fewer items that you can rewear. That way you can create your own signature style that you can have for years.”
Celebrating its 15th anniversary, The Devil Wears Prada remains a cultural phenomenon that has shaped the way we view the fashion industry. Meryl Streep’s renowned portrayal of Miranda Priestly, the steely editor-in-chief of Runway magazine, is one the world won’t soon forget.
Priestly’s effortless delivery of her infamous catchphrase, “that’s all,” held a gravity that clearly depicted fashion as a high-stress, high-stakes industry with no tolerance for any hint of incompetence.
Advertisement
The Devil Wears Prada is not the only media depiction of the fashion industry as a glamorous, impenetrable space where dreams are both dashed and realised. In 101 Dalmatians, Cruella De Vil is a designer whose love of fashion drives her to criminal extremes to obtain the coat of the season.
Ryan Murphy’s Halston miniseries on Netflix recently provided insight into the designer, who was prone to grand gestures of affection and verbal abuse of colleagues, providing another trope of the misunderstood genius who’ll dispose of anyone not aligned with his vision.
Advertisement
But how accurate are these film portrayals in reality? Four fashion industry professionals shared their perspectives on what it’s really like to work in fashion.
“I don’t feel like those interpretations reflect what hard work is and how you’re rewarded,” said Heather David, who has worked as in-house public relations for Balenciaga and Alexander Wang. “When I was young, my boss seemed like Miranda Priestly, criticising my work. I realised she pushed me because she saw more in me. Her pushing helped mebecome a better worker and leader.”
Advertisement
David described the environment at Balenciaga as “structured” and “traditional,” and said there’s a disconnect between media portrayals and the reality of fashion.
“Films show interns on a trip to Paris or using the fashion closet. I don’t think that’s realistic at all,” David said.
The fashion closet scene in The Devil Wears Prada set in motion millions of dreams that an intern could simply take a Fendi poncho and turn it into a personal wardrobe transformation. But that’s not real life. “I think people come into fashion naive and they only see these stories,” David said.
Cymone Williamson, a former publicist who worked for the brands DE Marketing and All the Rage, shared a similar sentiment. “People aren’t getting makeovers,” she told HuffPost. “I never came across anyone who had no experience and was moulded into a fashion prodigy.”
Williamson said The Devil Wears Prada thickened her skin, though. “I was prepared to be treated poorly. My experience was a mild version of what you see in movies. I was surprised I wasn’t fired when someone was having a bad day or I made a mistake.”
The Halston miniseries features tantrums and tongue-lashings galore ― there is a scene in which Halston’s career is on the decline and he storms into his atelier screaming at a designer for submitting a sketch without his approval.
Williamson said temper tantrums are not unheard of in reality. She recalled an instance with an employer in a PR showroom: “I had a male boss who was upset about losing an account. My desk was the first desk [near him], and he walked in and pushed everything off my desk. Everyone felt the wrath.”
The 2021 film Cruella touches on power dynamics between management and employees – Emma Stone’s titular character finds herself in a tense environment early on in her career, where she works with a designer who rules with an iron fist.
Recent headlines show that mistreatment of staff, by both designers and organisations, is still an issue in the fashion industry. Brands such as Refinery 29 and Manrepeller, for example, have been called out over the past few years.
Advertisement
513 designer Jerome Lamaar, also known asThe Style Monk, is familiar with industry antics. Starting with Baby Phat (run by Kimora Lee Simmons) at age 15, Lamaar said his trajectory has been similar to what he’s seen on film.
“Most of it is on point. I feel my life is very Funny Face he said. In that 1957 film, Jo Stockton, played by Audrey Hepburn, is a young librarian who’s plucked from obscurity and becomes a model at the pinnacle of fashion. While this is purely movie magic, Lamaar’s 20-year career is a one-in-a-million that’s not the norm.
He recalled an instance when “a PR person who was very well known didn’t recognise me and I was visiting a friend’s show. She kicked me out from backstage, and these are the old guards that the movies depict.” He added: “It’s because they are stressed out and it happens during Fashion Week.”
Julian J. Callis, who has worked at the Nicki Minaj Collection and Ralph Lauren, explained that while many films depict young women being groomed to become the future of fashion, they mostly focus on the character getting a glamorous life makeover, and ignore the actual hard work that goes into a career in fashion. “These films don’t show the gray area of starting from the bottom and working to the top,” he explained.
So, before you submit that application to become the next intern at your favourite fashion magazine, remember that it’s not all twirling around in fashion closets and trips to Paris.
HuffPost is part of Verizon Media. Verizon Media and our partners need your consent to access your device and use your data (including location) to understand your interests, and provide and measure personalised ads. Verizon Media will also provide you with personalised ads on partner products. Learn more.
How Verizon Media and our partners bring you better ad experiences
To give you a better overall experience, we want to provide relevant ads that are more useful to you. For example, when you search for a film, we use your search information and location to show the most relevant cinemas near you. We also use this information to show you ads for similar films you may like in the future. Like Verizon Media, our partners may also show you ads that they think match your interests.