I Grew Up Hunting. At 70, I Had A Life-Changing Realization About Killing.

As I enter the eighth decade of my life, I find that I no longer want to kill anything.

Anything at all.

This dawned on me one recent night as I was brushing my teeth. A fly was buzzing around, in the chaotic path that makes sense only to flies, and I absent-mindedly swatted at it with my free hand. It was an arguably lucky swat, sending the fly in a spiral down to the drain hole of the sink. As it lay there, weakly flailing alongside the stopper, a perfect victim waiting to be washed away, I reached for the faucet handle … and stopped myself, feeling a twinge of misgiving.

About a fly.

How did I come to this? Growing up in a family where hunting season meant putting food on the table, I often hunted with my father, and I killed numerous creatures, including deer and antelope. I would join in the field-dressing of the carcasses (these were not fancy hunts facilitated by a guide; it was just my dad and me, bumping along snowy gravel roads in a battered Chevy pickup), so I was immersed in the visceral aftermath. Whatever misgivings or remorse I had were overwhelmed by the work at hand.

The author (lower right) with his siblings. "Even at age 4 or so, I had a gun in my hand," he writes.
The author (lower right) with his siblings. “Even at age 4 or so, I had a gun in my hand,” he writes.

Courtesy of Larry F. Slonaker

My father had no remorse. He grew up in northern Montana over a hundred years ago, one of eight children who lived on a homestead in a shack without electricity or running water. Hunting was an intrinsic part of life for him and his brothers — a never-ending exercise to bring home protein to feed a large family. Beyond that, though, they took joy in the act itself — the rush brought on by pursuing, shooting and killing. I know it’s unbelievable (unfathomable, really) to many, but for some it’s undeniably true.

That’s the boldface dividing line between those who hunt and those who find it repulsive. As a kid, I had none of the privations my dad had experienced, but I was introduced early to that thrill of the hunt and the kill. In my childhood home, autumn was enlivened by football, Halloween and deer season.

Then the day came for me to leave that home. I went off to college in a big city, and then started a career in journalism, where co-workers were almost all anti-gun and anti-hunting and not timid about saying so. Within an otherwise like-minded bubble, I was an outlier who thought it was OK for a person (that is, a demonstrably sane person who has had safety training) to own a gun, and to shoot an animal for food. While I didn’t hide my feelings about it, I didn’t go out of my way to advertise them, either.

A photo of the author that ran with a magazine article he wrote about hunting.
A photo of the author that ran with a magazine article he wrote about hunting.

Courtesy of Tom Van Dyke

This changed one September, when an in-law who was a veteran hunter persuaded me to go deer-hunting with him. I thought it would be interesting to revisit that experience, and at the same time, reexamine this whole notion about the joy of hunting. I pitched a story to the editor of my newspaper’s Sunday magazine, the late Jeffrey Klein (once of Mother Jones), who signed off with enthusiasm.

The story ended up being a lot about the nature of hunting, and not very much about the hunt itself, except for a description of two or three confused minutes in which I ended up shooting a buck. When it was published — complete with a woodsy photo of me carrying a rifle and wearing a Natty Bumppo-like scowl — it elicited an onslaught of reader response, including the most hateful mail I’d ever received. (When you write a weekly column, as I did, you sometimes are a convenient target for the angry, the disgruntled, the anal grammarian, etc.). Workplace reactions were more muted, but I did detect a subtle shift among my colleagues.

The larger shift occurred internally. I spent a lot of time reviewing the hunt and brooded over one part in particular. As is often the case, no matter how skilled the hunter, there was a lapse of several seconds or longer between when the animal was struck and when it drew its last breath. As somebody with easy access to countless sources of humanely processed protein, I asked myself: How could I justify that lapse, just for a taste of some vague atavistic thrill?

I couldn’t. And that’s the realization that started my transformation.

At first the change was gradual. Because my wife and I live in a semi-rural area, we have numerous critters hanging around. When we moved in, our horseshoer — a lanky old cowpoke who loved to hunt and shoot — warned us about diurnal skunks, which he claimed are inevitably rabid.

“If you see a skunk in the daylight, you better shoot it,” he told me.

He said this with such conviction that I was ready to shoot any skunk under the sun.

But one afternoon as I was entering an outbuilding with one foot on a step and the other on the ground, I froze. A decidedly non-rabid skunk had suddenly materialized from behind me, and proceeded to casually waddle directly between my legs, and thence into a small gap under the building. (It did not emit that acrid, sense-shocking odor usually associated with a skunk… just a whiff, maybe akin to that of a slightly flatulent and embarrassed elder relative shuffling to a corner of the room.) I was no more inclined to shoot that skunk than my own dog.

The image of this creature going about its business — and, it seemed to inquire, why didn’t I mind my own? — awakened in me a sensibility of whenever-possible-live-and-let-live. As time passed there were more skunks, then possums in the garage (mama and four or five babies, all aghast at the site of me), bold and kind of scary raccoons, raucous crows, and so on. We cohabitated without incident, though the lawn and the dogs’ water bowls did suffer some.

"Here I am with my all-time favorite horse, an Appaloosa named Bobo," the author writes.
“Here I am with my all-time favorite horse, an Appaloosa named Bobo,” the author writes.

Courtesy of Larry F. Slonaker

This became the rhythm of life for months and years, until a sudden change. Maybe intensification would be a better word. A time came when I swung drastically to where live-and-let-live became more like live-and-let-everything live. Not only that — help them live.

There was the mouse that had been fetched indoors by the cat, who relinquished it only after considerable coaxing. I gently swept the dazed creature into a dustpan and transported it to a reasonably safe spot outside. Soon after, there was another mouse (wait, was this the same mouse?), whose best-laid plan to get a drink from the edge of the swimming pool had gone agley. As it desperately swam, I scooped it out and deposited it to another safe spot, adding a gratuitous admonishment to be more careful.

There was the wolf spider that I collected with the same dustpan; the lizard, also packed in by the cat, also relocated via the dustpan; and the hummingbird, which trapped itself in the garage and chose the cobwebby window as the only way out, despite the garage door whose gaping openness, in hummingbird dimensions, must have been akin to the Grand Canyon. (The process of shepherding it out the door required a full 15 minutes of slow-mo walk-and-talk-and-wave action.) There was even the nest of pesky yellowjackets gingerly hauled from the barbecue area to the back pasture, which mitigated their peskiness not at all.

And then at last there was the fly, dazed at the sinkhole, my hand poised at the faucet handle, bringing me back to the question: How did I come to this?

Answer: I got old.

The author in his office.
The author in his office.

Courtesy of Larry F. Slonaker

After age 30, the ensuing birthdays were inconsequential. Just another day. But surprise! The 70th, the ol’ seven-oh, wasn’t another day, but that day. At 70, a heretofore gossamer notion was revealed to be fact. Everybody must die — shockingly, even me.

Facing this reality, I realized I had no interest in hastening others to their own fate. I kept thinking of Robert Burns’ mouse, and those self-referential lines:

…thy poor, earth-born companion, / An’ fellow-mortal!

Yes, on this earth, we far-flung and disparate fellow-mortals are all crowded together onto one ineluctable path to the same end. So don’t let me rush you.

Some will want to remind me that as we proceed on the path, there always will be blood. Old fools cannot change the immemorial dynamic of dog-eat-dog and cat-eat-mouse and kill-or-be-killed. Albert Schweitzer’s “Reverence for Life” is delusional, laughable. I’m unmanly, sentimental, weak.

Yeah, I’m good with all that.

As for the fly: I wrapped it up in a bit of tissue, took it outside, and lay it on the porch. The next morning — where, how, who knows, didn’t matter — it was gone.

Larry F. Slonaker is an essayist and the author of the novel “Nothing Got Broke.” He was born and raised in Great Falls, Montana, and worked as a writer and editor at the once-renowned San Jose Mercury News, and the still-renowned Stanford University. There were a few stops at never-renowned places as well. He and his wife now live in California on five acres, which is just large enough to contain three horses and several semi-feral (all neutered!) cats.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Share Button

Eight Books To Read From 2026’s Best TV And Movie Adaptations

Whether it’s the new Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility adaptations (this time from Netflix and Focus Features, respectively) or yet another instalment in the Dune franchise, 2026′s film and TV schedule ought to make readers pretty happy.

There’s something for sci-fi, romance, and classic lit lovers alike – bonus points if you’re a fan of Twilight star Robert Pattinson, who’s set to appear in both Christopher Nolan flick The Odyssey and Dune: Part Three this year.

Zendaya will also feature in both movies alongside her The Drama co-star.

If you want to read ahead of this year’s releases or are keen to find out more about the origins of the movies and shows already out this year, we’ve got your back (or should that be your spine?).

Here are eight books to read from 2026′s most exciting book-to-screen options:

1) Project Hail Mary, by Andy Weir

Ryan Gosling at the Project Hail Mary premiere
Ryan Gosling at the Project Hail Mary premiere

via Associated Press

The 2021 sci-fi novel focuses on teacher Ryland Grace, who wakes up on a spaceship one day with no memory of how he got there. Then, he learns he’s accidentally become humanity’s last hope (space enthusiasts will be pleased to learn that some of its scientific details are NASA-backed).

The movie stars Ryan Gosling, Oscar nominee Sandra Hüller, and, if you listen close enough, Meryl Streep. Even better news: it’s set to be released on streamer MGM+ on Thursday, June 18, in the UK, and can be rented through YouTube or Amazon Prime already.

Movie release date: It came out on March 9, 2026

2) Sunrise On The Reaping, by Suzanne Collins

The Hunger Games author’s prequel explores the experience Katniss and Peeta’s tutor, Haymitch, had as a young tribute in Panem’s earlier Games.

Portrayed by Owen Wilson in the original movies, Sunrise On The Reaping’s Haymitch will be played by Joseph Zada (previously part of Prime Video’s YA adaptation, We Were Liars) instead. The cast will also include Ralph Fiennes, Regretting You’s McKenna Grace, and Hocus Pocus 2′s Whitney Peak.

Movie release date: 20 November, 2026

3) Rivals, by Jilly Cooper

David Tennant at a Rivals season 2 screening
David Tennant at a Rivals season 2 screening

via Associated Press

The 1988 novel is the second of Dame Jilly Cooper’s 11 Rutshire Chronicles books (the last, Tackle!, was published much later than the others, in 2023).

Not only is the Rivals book filled with all the sex, scandal, and ’80s glamour you’d expect, rumour has it that the production company that made the Disney+ version has the rights to nine of the original 10 books – meaning readers who keep leafing through the series could be richly rewarded later on.

TV show release date: the first season is available to stream on Disney+, as are the first six episodes of season two. However, the series has taken a break and is expected to return to the streamer in November 2026.

4) Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen

It’s no secret I’m a bit of an Austen fan, but even those who don’t usually go in for Regency novels ought to give the classic book a go. The funny, quietly subversive story focuses on the almost-certainly-financially-screwed Bennet sisters, the ridiculous and cynical Georgian marriage market, and some very eligible real estate.

If nothing else, reading it will add an extra layer of enjoyment to on-screen hits like The Other Bennet Sister and Bridget Jones.

Plus, when the 2026 Netflix series (starring Emma Corrin and Olivia Colman) comes out, you can decide for yourself whether screenwriter Dolly Alderton kept faithful ot the text – or, like Emerald Fennell’s Wuthering Heights, carved her own controversial path.

TV show release date: autumn, 2026

5) The Odyssey, by Homer

The way this Ancient Greek poem is talked about, you’d swear it wasn’t basically a sex and violence-packed soap opera. But in many ways, soldier Odysseus’ long journey home is exactly that – he meets with fantastical creatures, evil witches, and sneaky sirens during what must surely go down in history as the world’s most eventful commute.

It seems Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey, which stars Matt Damon in the lead role, Anne Hathaway as his wife Penelope and Tom Holland as his son Telemachus, alongside Zendaya, Lupita Nyong’o, Travis Scott, Charlize Theron and Robert Pattinson, will be similarly impressive.

Not only is the movie shot entirely with IMAX cameras – a first for director but the star-studded cast has described it as “unlike anything that I’ve ever seen before” and “exactly what you want [from] a summer movie”.

Movie release date: July 17, 2026

6) The Testaments, by Margaret Atwood

A sequel to The Handmaid’s Tale, this story is set 15 years after the cliffhanger ending of the first book. Aunt Lydia shows her mettle as she fights against the oppressive regime set in the original novel.

The Disney+ series sees Ann Dowd, who also played Aunt Lydia in The Handmaid’s Tale series, reprise her role. She stars alongside One Battle After Another actor Chase Infiniti and Bafta winner Lucy Halliday in a show critics have dubbed “ravishing” and “a triumph”.

TV show release: The first season is already out on Disney+.

7) Dune and Dune Messiah, by Frank Herbert

me reading the first Dune trilogy, despite my aversion to sci-fi
me reading the first Dune trilogy, despite my aversion to sci-fi

Amy Glover / HuffPost UK

To be honest, the first novel will see you through most of the first two movies, and is more than enough to call yourself a sandworm bookworm. But Dune: Part Three leans heavily on Dune: Messiah, the second in Herbert’s canonical six-part series.

It’s less action-packed than the first entry, but it contains arguably weirder characters – like a gas-guzzling fish-human hybrid – that make you wonder where the movie, starring Timothée Chalamet, Zendaya, Robert Pattinson, and Florence Pugh, could possibly go.

Movie release date: December 18, 2026 (just about enough time to finish the first trilogy)

8) Sense and Sensibility, by Jane Austen

It might not be as essential an Austen read as Pride and Prejudice. But Elinor and Marianne Dashwood’s plight is no less engaging than the Bennet sisters’: after some significant downsizing, the family has to make their way in a very new society. Yearning and love troubles inevitably ensue.

This year’s movie marks the first screen adaptation of the book since the BBC’s excellent 2008 TV series. Only time will tell if stars Daisy Edgar-Jones and Hanna star Esmé Creed-Miles will prove just as dazzling on the big screen.

Movie release date: September 25, 2026.

Share Button

‘Your Party Isn’t Serious’: Reform’s Richard Clashes With GB News Reporter Over Defence

Reform’s deputy leader was left squirming by a GB News journalist over the party’s record on defence.

Richard Tice clashed with Christopher Hope, the broadcaster’s political editor, after John Healey’s resignation as defence secretary.

Hope said the fact that Reform does not even have a designated defence spokesman showed the party “isn’t serious” about the issue.

At one point in the live interview, Tice even claimed that Nigel Farage, the party’s leader, was also its defence spokesman.

Hope told him: “You don’t take it seriously … you don’t have a defence spokesman. That says everything about your seriousness as a party.

“If you think you are a serious party on defence, who is your spokesman?”

A clearly-flustered Tice insisted that “what matters” is Reform’s pledge to boost defence spending.

“We’ve shown how you do it, that’s what matters,” he said. “That’s why we’re leading in the polls.”

But Hope asked him again: “Can you name your defence spokesman? It’s not an MP, is it? It’s someone else. Who is your defence spokesman?”

Tice said: “Listen, Nigel and I cover foreign and defence, and we know how you get the money. You scrap net zero, you provide at least an extra £10-£20 billion as required in order to keep British citizens safe.”

Hope hit back: “But your party isn’t serious without having a defence spokesman. You can’t come on GB News – it insults our viewers for you to say it’s important.”

Watch the full clash below.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

Critics Hail Steven Spielberg’s ‘Gripping’ Disclosure Day As His Best Film In Years

Critics have been weighing in on Disclosure Day, which sees Steven Spielberg returning to his beloved science fiction genre.

In his latest big-screen offering, the legendary filmmaker is once again exploring the idea of extraterrestrial beings coming to earth – only this time he’s taking a close look at the philosophical and religious implications of an alien invasion.

Disclosure Day boasts a star-studded cast that includes Emily Blunt, Josh O’Connor and Colin Firth, and tells the story of a small group of individuals who become involved in a government conspiracy to keep the existence of intelligent alien life a secret.

Early reviews hailed the film as a “gripping” and “thrilling’ masterpiece from the legendary director, earning an 82% score on Rotten Tomatoes.

However, not all reviewers were in love with the new sci-fi blockbuster, with some critics – including several from prominent British outlets – claiming it is “drab” and a “rehash” of Spielberg’s past works.

Here’s a selection of what critics are saying about Disclosure Day…

“Disclosure Day feels not like a repetition but like a thunderclap culmination, the kind of movie you make when, at age 79, you’re not only at the peak of your skills, but you realise time is running out. What, exactly, do you want to say, and how do you find the pictures, the words?

“The pictures and words are all right there in Disclosure Day, an eleventh-hour plea to reconnect with all that makes us human, even if we need to invoke the help of imaginary aliens to do it.”

Emily Blunt and Josh O'Connor as seen in one of Disclosure Day's most dramatic sequences
Emily Blunt and Josh O’Connor as seen in one of Disclosure Day’s most dramatic sequences

“Disclosure Day has many layers, but it is also a crackerjack rip-roaring ride for much of its running time, a movie that essentially centres on two main characters in search of answers to what is happening to them, keeping the audience in the dark as much as they are.”

“What Spielberg has conjured here is some of his vintage boldness in transforming the cinema screen into a magical theatre of childlike wonder.”

“While Spielberg has never lost his sense of fun, Disclosure Day is uniquely fortified by the sense that he’s still searching for new ways to enrapture a jaded audience with his spectacle, and the movie’s ethos becomes that much harder to deny every time its director manages to suspend our disbelief all over again.

“There might not be anything here quite as inventive as the spider robot sequence from Minority Report, but a certain setpiece – the one that starts with a car getting shoved into an oncoming freight train – is as gripping as Hollywood action gets.”

“Disclosure Day is never anything other than entertaining and grade-A fun; rare enough in the movies or anywhere else, rocketing along with barnstorming set-pieces, exhilarating chases, funny lines and a career-topper of a performance from Blunt who may yet be morphing into a female version of Tom Hanks.”

Colin Firth joins fellow Brits Emily Blunt and Josh O'Connor in Disclosure Day
Colin Firth joins fellow Brits Emily Blunt and Josh O’Connor in Disclosure Day

“The movie duly pulls out all the stops, and then a couple more. As if to say, ‘still got it!’, there are big-ticket action sequences and the screwball comic interludes Spielberg always had a knack for. The ride is rarely dull.”

“There are allegories that can be read about fear of the unknown breeding cruelty and exploitation, but Disclosure Day is first and foremost a propulsive yarn with thematic roots in hope, truth, empathy and perhaps even spirituality.”

IGN (7/10)

“The film is, in a lot of ways, vintage Spielberg: He hasn’t lost a step with a camera that sprints from start to finish, there are some fantastic technical sequences, and the performances from the two leads in particular are great.

“And while Disclosure Day stumbles a bit for me at the finish line in a way that makes some of the film’s other nits a little more worth picking, it’s still an original, big-budget science fiction conversation-starter from one of cinema’s all-time greats.”

“While Disclosure Day doesn’t live up to the high standards he’s [Spielberg] set, it’s still a thrill ride, thumbing its nose at authority and begging its audience for more empathy, not less.

“Even if not all the pieces snap flawlessly into place, Disclosure Day is a reminder of how much magic is still left up Spielberg’s sleeve.”

Two-time Oscar nominee Colman Domingo in Disclosure Day
Two-time Oscar nominee Colman Domingo in Disclosure Day

“[Disclosure Day’s] script exaggerates the best and the worst of how humans might respond to such a revelation, and Spielberg struggles to split the difference between paranoid-thriller cynicism and his usual mode of emotional uplift.

“That waffling ultimately strands Disclosure Day on a heartfelt yet fuzzy middle ground, with a generalised plea for cross-species understanding that, even bolstered by the reliable stirrings of a John Williams score, left me dispiritingly dry-eyed.”

“Spielberg, as part of the film’s publicity, has suggested that he believes in alien visitations, and that he’s an advocate for disclosure. But where Close Encounters tapped into the mystery of all this with an innocence that was both starry-eyed and spectacular, Disclosure Day feels like a thriller docudrama that’s too cut-and-dried about what it believes.

“The actors are quite good (especially Blunt, who makes you feel she’s seeing the uncanny), but for all the film’s slow build it doesn’t take us anywhere overly surprising. It just confirms the ‘truth’ that’s been out there for so long it’s starting to feel like a fairy tale for the dispossessed.”

“Essentially, it’s a drab X-Files episode, or a more conventional One Battle After Another, in which some people we don’t care about are hunted by some other people we don’t care about.”

“Sadly, there’s nothing original here, or at least nothing to match, say, Jordan Peele’s vastly superior UFO drama Nope. Instead it’s just Spielberg badly rehashed, poorly reheated, lukewarm and with extra treacle.”

“It is shot and staged with Spielberg’s signature elegance: a central foot-to-car-to-train chase moves with such breathless lucidity it is as if the director is beaming excitement directly into your brain. But the plotting surrounding the action is often woolly and lopsided, while the tone is an awkward mix of solemnity and silliness.”

Disclosure Day is out in cinemas now.

Share Button

What is meningitis B and why is a vaccine only being offered to some teenagers?

Only select groups of teenagers and some young people will be eligible for the vaccine. Here’s why.

Share Button

Scientists found the strength training sweet spot for a longer life

A long-running study suggests that 90 to 120 minutes of strength (resistance) training each week may be the ideal range for reducing the risk of death. The research, published online in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, followed participants for up to 30 years.

The benefits were even greater when strength training was combined with aerobic exercise. However, researchers found no additional advantage from doing more than 120 minutes of strength training per week. That level of exercise was linked to a 19% lower risk of death from cardiovascular disease and a 27% lower risk of death from neurological disease.

Strength Training and Long-Term Health

While the life-extending benefits of aerobic exercise are well established, the impact of muscle-strengthening activities on overall mortality and specific causes of death has been less clear. Researchers wanted to determine whether strength training alone, or combined with aerobic exercise, could influence those risks.

To investigate, they analyzed data collected over three decades from three major studies: the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1992-2022), the Nurses’ Health Study (2002-21), and the Nurses’ Health Study II (2003-21). Together, the studies included 147,374 participants (31,540 men and 115,834 women).

Every two years, participants reported how much time they spent each week doing strength training and aerobic exercise. Aerobic activities included brisk walking, running, jogging, swimming, cycling, tennis, squash, strenuous outdoor work, and stair climbing. Strength training included exercises using weights or body weight, such as press ups, squats, and lunges.

At the start of the study, participants were an average of 54 years old. Those who reported higher levels of strength training were generally younger, weighed less, followed healthier lifestyles, and engaged in more aerobic activity than those who did no strength training.

What the Researchers Found

About three quarters (74%) of participants exceeded the recommended 150 minutes of moderate intensity aerobic exercise per week, equivalent to 7.5 MET hours over the long term. METs measure how many calories are burned during physical activity compared with resting.

Nearly half (46%) of participants reported doing some form of strength training.

Over the 30-year follow-up period, 35,798 participants died. Researchers found that higher long-term levels of weekly strength training were associated with a lower risk of death.

After accounting for other factors that could affect the results, participants who performed 90-119 minutes of strength training per week had a 13% lower risk of death from any cause. No additional reduction in risk was observed above 120 minutes per week.

That same 90-119 minute range was also associated with a 19% lower risk of death from cardiovascular disease and a 27% lower risk of death from neurological disease.

Cancer-related benefits appeared at lower amounts of strength training. Participants who performed 1-29 minutes per week had a 21% lower risk of cancer death, while those doing 30-59 minutes per week had an 18% lower risk.

The Power of Combining Cardio and Strength Training

Compared with people who did less than 7.5 MET hours of aerobic activity per week and no strength training, participants who performed strength training alone for 1-59 minutes or 60-119 minutes per week had a 7-11% lower risk of death.

Aerobic exercise on its own also showed strong benefits. Any amount above 7.5 MET hours per week was associated with a 26-43% lower risk of death.

The lowest mortality risk was seen among people who combined high levels of aerobic exercise with strength training. Those who accumulated 30-44 MET hours of aerobic activity per week and 60-119 minutes of strength training had a 45% lower risk of death.

Even greater reductions were observed among participants who performed 45+ MET hours of aerobic activity per week. In that group, the risk of death was 53% to 58% lower regardless of how much strength training they did.

Important Limitations

The researchers emphasized that this was an observational study, meaning it cannot prove that strength training directly caused the reductions in mortality risk.

They also noted several limitations. Exercise habits were self reported, which can introduce inaccuracies. The analysis did not include certain forms of strength training, such as calisthenics and Pilates. In addition, information was not available on the duration of individual workouts or the intensity of strength training sessions, factors that could have influenced the results.

Despite those limitations, the researchers concluded:

“Our findings on different dose-response relationships between long-term resistance training with all-cause and cause-specific mortality suggest that different amounts of resistance training may be needed to optimize benefits across outcomes.

“The observed pattern that adding resistance training further reduced mortality risk across all levels of aerobic activity up to 45 MET hours/week supports current recommendations encouraging both types of activity to maximize mortality benefits.”

Share Button

‘I’ve never been this good’ – revolutionary immune reset puts lupus in remission

Patients on the trial have not needed medication to manage their condition.

Share Button

‘I spent uni savings on getting my teeth fixed’ – how NHS dentist shortage is costing a fortune

People tell BBC Your Voice the rising cost of private dentistry is putting them in a difficult position.

Share Button

Meningitis B vaccine to be offered to a million young people

The decision for the one-off vaccine programme follows the unprecedented outbreak in Kent this year.

Share Button

Your Body Odor Changes With Age. Luckily, We Found A Solution To ‘Old People Smell.’

People of all ages get body odor at some point, especially in the summer. But did you know that body odor can change with aging? In previous coverage, experts have shared that age-related body odor is a thing, caused by skin naturally producing different organic compounds. The smell is distinct from regular BO, yet you could be so used to it that you don’t notice it when others around you do. Still, it isn’t a poor hygiene indicator, as it doesn’t come off with just normal soap and water. It may, however, be addressed with this special bar of Japanese persimmon soap from the brand Mirai Clinical, which currently happens to be on super-rare sale at 20% off right this second.

In previous HuffPost reporting, this circular, amber bar was suggested as a possible solution to “old people smell” — a biological phenomenon caused by the compound 2-nonenal.

Typically beginning after age 40 and caused by antioxidant defenses declining in the skin, nonenal odors can have a mild to moderate organic or musty smell that varies from person to person, we’re told by dermatologists. And you might not even be able to notice it on yourself due to something called olfactory adaptation, where you become accustomed to the scent since its development is so gradual. It’s also not necessarily unpleasant to all humans, since smell is so subjective. But, if it is a concern for you, this is a possible solution.

“Persimmon soap, which contains tannins, has a plausible mechanism and a long history of use, though large randomized trials are lacking,” dermatologist Dr. Naana Boakye, founder of Bergen Dermatology, previously suggested.

And while Boakye did not mention a specific brand, the Mirai bar soap appears to be the most popular and widely reviewed option. (The founder even appeared on “Shark Tank” last year.) This formula has a dense concentration of persimmon-derived tannins, along with green tea extract, an ingredient that’s rich in antioxidants for continual defense throughout the day.

The palm-sized, delicately scented soap works best when lathered onto key areas of the body where nonenal odors generally develop like feet, under the armpits and along the back of the neck.

One Amazon customer put it to the test behind their ears, another part of the body where this smell can commonly develop.

“The results were pretty remarkable,” they claimed in their review. “I washed behind my ears on day one and then didn’t do it again for three days, constantly smelling that area each day. The smell stayed gone for two days, and by about the third day, it was starting to become slightly noticeable. That made me a believer.”

Others claim the soap worked on perimenopausal-related odors and just body odors in general that had previously been resistant to other soap formulas.

Reviewers love Mirai Clinical’s persimmon soap for making them feel (and smell!) their best. Read more 5-star reviews and grab a bar on sale.

Magical!! This stuff really works! No more perimenopause weird odor. I was going crazy! Bought a bunch more because it’s an essential now.” — An

The perfect soap for seniors. This is a fantastic product. I had been changing soaps, shampoos, laundry soaps and sheets, and the unpleasant smell remained. Within days of using Mirai clinical persimmon soap I smell clean and fresh again. I also use the deodorant. I like the round shape of the bar and it makes a nice lather. I recommend this to everyone.” — Kindle customer

“Now get ready because I am going to get slightly gross for a minute. I rubbed my finger behind both my ears and smelled and yeah, it wasn’t great, even though I just washed that morning. So I gave the soap a shot and in particular focused on behind the ears. The result were pretty remarkable. I washed behind my ears on day one and then didn’t do it again for 3 days. Constantly smelling that area each day. The smell stayed gone for 2 days and by about the 3rd day it was starting to become slightly noticeable. That made me a believer. So I started using it in all the places the nonenal is at. I start by washing my entire body with regular soap and then at the end of my shower I use this soap in all the places they teach you that nonenal shows up. I have to say that I feel much more confident about how I smell after using it. No one wants to go through hormonal changes but we all have to. At least now we can be more comfortable in our skin while we go through it. I know it’s very expensive for a soap. But it is worth it. And if you only use it on the parts of the body that the nonenal smell comes from you won’t have to buy it again for a couple of months.” — L.B. (This review has been edited for length. Read the full review.)

“I’m glad I decided to try this soap despite the cost. It’s a large bar that hopefully will last for months and lathers very well with a pleasant clean smell. I noticed after using the bar the sour odor that I have been struggling with is absent. I hope this soap works as well for you as it has for me.” — Patricia Kroepel

The experts consulted for this story do not necessarily endorse the products ahead unless otherwise noted.

Looking for more dermatologist-recommended products for combating age-related body odor? Check out these three finds, courtesy of HuffPost shopping.

Amazon

A Korean cleansing balm with persimmon

“It’s rather rare to find a toner or cleanser with persimmon extract, but the Then I Met You Living Cleansing Balm has one of the highest sources of [it],” Safaee said. It’s not just persimmon extract that makes this sorbet-soft balm a concentrated source of tannins, but also a dose of grapeseed oils.

And in case you’re not familiar, cleansing balms are an effective and expert-recommended way to melt away sunscreen, stubborn makeup, oil and other impurities from the skin before using a traditional cleanser in your nightly skin care routine.

Amazon

An alcohol-free witch hazel toner

According to Los Angeles-based board-certified dermatologist Dr. Maryam Safaee, witch hazel is one of the most popular forms of tannins and although there are a lot of toner options out there featuring this ingredient, this classic witch hazel astringent by Thayers is her favorite.

“Usually, most toners are made with alcohol, which can be very dehydrating to the skin. However, Thayers has the water-based witch hazel toner, which makes it gentle enough to be used daily,” she said.

Available in scented or unscented versions, this hydrating and irritation-free formula is also affordable enough to apply liberally not just to the face, but to key areas of the body that produce nonenal odors like the back of the neck, armpits, groin and feet.

Sephora

A body cleanser with green tea extract

Safaee mentioned green tea as another tannin-containing ingredient useful to combat nonenal odors, so we selected Youth to the People’s Superfood body cleanser, a nourishing and gently purifying formula containing both green tea and kale extracts — both of which are rich in antioxidants. Featuring notes of fresh greens, black pepper and cedarwood, the Superfood body wash also contains niacinamide, another beloved antioxidant that can hydrate and even skin tone.

The Real Deal: We use deal trackers and commerce experience to sift through “fake” hike-and-drop deals and other deceptive sales tactics. Products will usually be rated at least 4 stars with a minimum 15% discount. (And when there’s an exception, we’ll tell you why.)

Share Button