‘Don’t Do It, Andy’: Why Labour MPs Were Begging The PM Not To Call An Early Election

What a difference a year makes.

Labour members will start gathering in Liverpool this weekend for their annual conference with a noticeable spring in their step.

The party now has a confirmed, if slight, lead in the opinion polls as Andy Burnham continues to enjoy a honeymoon period after replacing Keir Starmer as Labour leader and prime minister in July.

His optimistic talk of putting “hope in every heart” appears to have resonated with a beleaguered electorate weighed down by more than a decade of austerity, stagnant economic growth, rising prices and political turmoil.

The so-called “Burnham Bounce” has also coincided with a downturn in the fortunes of Reform UK, whose own poll numbers have fallen since May, when the party enjoyed election success in England, Scotland and Wales.

Investigations into the financial affairs of Nigel Farage and his party have cut through with a public who, just a few months ago, seemed to be preparing to elect a Reform government.

It is all a far cry from 12 months ago, when the Labour conference was a downbeat affair as Starmer’s government lurched from scandal to disaster.

Deputy PM Angela Rayner had been forced to quit just weeks before over her tax affairs, forcing Starmer into a clumsily-handled and deeply unpopular reshuffle.

That was swiftly followed by the sacking of Lord Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to Washington over his friendship with the convicted paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein.

Ironically, the high point of last year’s conference for Starmer was his success in seeing off Burnham’s own failed attempt to seize the initiative.

The then mayor of Greater Manchester was relentlessly attacked by Starmer loyalists for saying in a pre-conference interview that the UK must “get beyond this thing of being in hock to the bond markets”.

Keir Starmer gives his keynote speech at last year’s Labour Party conference in Liverpool.
Keir Starmer gives his keynote speech at last year’s Labour Party conference in Liverpool.

via Associated Press

Although a chastened Burnham ended up leaving the conference early, just six months later he became MP for Makerfield and the PM-in-waiting.

Now, much of the talk going into this year’s event is not whether Burnham will become prime minister, but whether he would attempt to secure his own five-year mandate from the public by calling an early general election.

The PM sought to kill off the speculation by telling ITV Calendar on Friday that the next election will not be until 2029, the latest it can possibly be.

Nevertheless, that is unlikely to stop some from urging Burnham to go the country either next year or in 2028, should Labour’s poll lead grow.

According to the Telegraph, several of the PM’s No.10 advisers believe he should go to the country in the spring, but that was disputed by others in his inner circle.

“Utter bollocks,” said one senior Downing Street source when asked by HuffPost UK if an early election is on the cards.

“The PM is a man focused and determined to change the country. The only people raising the prospect of an early election are those conducting as a subtle-as-an-elephant Tory whispering campaign.”

Another No.10 source said reports of an early election were “worse than bollocks, it’s embarrassing clickbait”.

Those pushing an early election point to two mega-polls published in recent days which show Labour emerging from an early election as easily the largest party, ahead of the Tories and Reform.

However, in both scenarios, the party would lose its majority, leaving Burnham reliant on the support of the Lib Dems and other left-of-centre parties to get his programme through parliament.

Chris Hopkins, political research director at pollsters Savanta, told HuffPost UK: “Labour going for an early election based on these latest polls means two things: Labour loses hundreds of seats compared to 2024, and it’s an admission from Andy Burnham that he doesn’t think he can further improve Labour’s fortunes.”

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Labour MPs – many of whom have only been in the Commons for a little over two years – are less-than enthusiastic about the prospect of an snap election that would see at least 100 of them lose their seats.

One Cabinet minister said: “If I was Andy, I would be very reluctant to call an election because right now he’s got 400 Labour MPs.

“No matter that happens, if you wake up every morning and you’ve got 400 MPs and a big guaranteed majority, you’re in a good place.

“If you look at the sweep of Labour history being in this position doesn’t happen very often, so I’d be very careful about gambling with that.”

A Labour backbencher was equally clear in his opposition to an election now.

“I don’t want to hear him announce a general election,” the MP said. “I don’t think the country’s ready for it and voters certainly wouldn’t thank us for it.”

Another minister said: “The polls are simply too volatile right now to justify an early election.”

A Labour source added: “I can see why an early election would be tempting when you’re caught up in party conference.

“But the public don’t want one, and voters wouldn’t thank Andy for calling one.”

Burnham is still writing his conference speech, which he will deliver to the party faithful on Tuesday afternoon.

He has been writing it himself “in snatched moments on trains, planes and in his car,” according to one No.10 aide.

The conference slogan is ‘Hope Again’, and the PM plans to deliver a message of optimism to the country, explaining how he plans to get a solve long-standing problems like youth unemployment and the housing crisis.

“People know what the problems are facing the country, but they want to know what the government is going to do about it,” said one Downing Street insider.

“They want to be given hope about the way forward and this is the PM’s opportunity to set that out.”

But a senior Labour figure warned that the real challenges for Burnham will come when the political caravan has packed up for conference season and gone back to Westminster.

“There’s no doubt Andy will have a great conference,” he said. “It’s in Liverpool, it’s his first one as leader and he’ll make a good speech.

“But the real business will happen when he gets back to Westminster the week after. That’s when things will get real for him.

“There’s the Budget next month, defence spending, the growing threat from Russia, and his 10-year plan.

“His diagnosis of the country’s problems has been good, but voters will judge him on how he plans to fix them.

“The danger of conference is that the party gets too high on its own supply. They shouldn’t mistake the conference hall for the country, because there’s a world of a difference between the two.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

Andy Burnham Says The Next General Election Won’t Be Until 2029

Andy Burnham has insisted the next general election will not take place until 2029.

The prime minister moved to kill off mounting speculation that he was preparing to call a snap poll next spring.

Under parliamentary rules, the next election must take place in 2029 at the latest.

In an interview with ITV Calendar, Burnham was asked if that was when it would happen.

He said: “Well, yes, that’s that’s when the next election will be. All of this speculation on an early election, I can knock that dead.

“You know people want me, new in office, to be getting on with the job of delivering on the things that we’ve discussed in this interview rather than putting self-serving politics before that, which was what I would be doing if I call an election. I’m not going to do that.”

In a separate interview with BBC East Midlands, the PM also ruled out the chances of a general election taking place at the same time as local elections scheduled for next May.

Labour has enjoyed a boost in support since Burnham replaced Keir Starmer as prime minister in July, fuelling rumours that he is tempted to call an election to secure his own five-year mandate.

Two mega-polls published this week showed Labour winning most seats at an election held now, but they would also lose more than 100 MPs and their Commons majority.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

5 Places A Doctor Always Brings Hand Sanitiser During Flu Season

It’s happening again. The tissues have started coming out in force on my bus rides. Friends send stuffy voice notes to apologise – “I can’t make it,” they sniff pitifully. “There’s something going round”.

Though you can catch the flu at any point in the year, it’s especially common in the colder months. Spending more time indoors with the windows shut increases the spread of disease, while lower vitamin D supplies mean our bodies are less able to fight bugs off.

The NHS recommends common-sense advice, like washing your hands often and not sharing personal items like towels with sick people, to keep colds at bay. And if you don’t have access to soap and warm water (the most effective hand-washing method), alcohol-based hand sanitiser is a great tool too.

Here, HuffPost UK asked Dr Donald Grant, a GP and senior clinical advisor at The Independent Pharmacy, where he brings hand sanitiser during flu season (and when you can leave it at home).

Where should I use hand sanitiser?

1) Public transport

This, he said, is an “obvious” pick.

“Handrails, poles, seat backs, and ticket machines are touched by hundreds of people a day, and buses and trains are often crowded and poorly ventilated in autumn and winter, giving flu viruses plenty of opportunity to spread”.

Keeping a bottle of hand sanitiser in your coat pocket or handbag gives you a chance to “clean your hands once you get off, before you touch your face, eat or check your phone”.

This transfer of germs – from hands to eyes, nose, or mouth – can make cold transmission especially likely, as it delivers germs almost directly to your mucous membranes.

2) Supermarkets

Not only are these filled with both people and things multiple people have touched, but self-service checkout screens can be a real bug-fest, too.

3) Gyms

Think of all those sweaty weights and unwiped surfaces, not to mention the pools and saunas whose warm, damp environments provide the perfect breeding ground for bacteria.

Not only that, but we breathe more heavily when working out, potentially expelling more disease-carrying saliva.

4) Cafés

Basically, Dr Greenyer said, we should bring hand sanitiser “anywhere with shared touchscreens, such as self-checkouts and cash machines”.

5) Hospitals, GP surgeries, and care homes

These places are filled with people who are 1) already likelier to be sick and 2) packed tightly together in an enclosed space. Therefore, it’s best to use an alcohol-based hand sanitiser in these places, “both to protect yourself and the vulnerable people around you”.

However, the doctor stressed that hand sanitiser “should never be used as a replacement for handwashing, as [soap and warm water] is still the most effective option for limiting the spread of bacteria”.

Where don’t we need to bring hand sanitiser?

With that said, Dr Greenyer told us that “There’s no need to sanitise constantly”.

Outdoor areas, like

  1. Parks,
  2. Open-air markets, or
  3. The high street

are much safer, he added. This is because “viruses disperse more easily in fresh air and you’re touching far fewer shared surfaces”.

The GP ended: “It’s also worth remembering that flu spreads mainly through droplets from coughs and sneezes, so good hand hygiene works best alongside other simple habits, like catching sneezes in a tissue, staying home when you’re unwell and getting the flu vaccine if you’re eligible”.

And when needed, a little bottle of hand sanitiser could help to protect you on the go.

Share Button

CERN has begun disconnecting the Large Hadron Collider

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) stretches 27 km around and relies on thousands of magnets of different types – dipoles, quadrupoles, sextupoles, octupoles, decapoles, etc. – to steer and control its particle beams. Each type performs a specialized task.

Some of the most important are known as inner triplets. These groups of three quadrupole magnets (hence the name) sit on both sides of the LHC’s four main experiments. Their job is to focus the particle beams as tightly as possible just before the particles collide inside the detectors.

The tighter the beams are “compressed,” the greater the chance that particles will collide. That makes the inner triplets essential for increasing the LHC’s luminosity, i.e. the number of collisions that occur in a given period of time. More luminosity means more collisions, giving researchers more data to analyze.

Preparing the LHC for a New Era

A major part of the future High-Luminosity LHC (HiLumi LHC) project involves replacing the existing inner triplets with a much more powerful generation of magnets.

The work is taking place during the third long shutdown (LS3). Reently, crews cut the first magnet interconnection, formally beginning the replacement operation. CERN Director-General Mark Thomson also visited LHC Point 1 (the ATLAS experiment) to mark the milestone.

“The replacement of these magnets with the new HiLumi LHC inner triplets is crucial for the coming high-luminosity years. The first quadrupole of the new triplets should arrive in the tunnel at the start of 2029. In total, 16 cryostats and 28 cryo-assemblies will be installed – a major undertaking,” explains Jean-Philippe Tock, Head of the LS3 Coordination Team.

Magnets About 40% Stronger

The new inner triplets are the product of years of research and development. They represent a major technological advance over the niobium-titanium magnets currently operating inside the LHC.

Instead of niobium-titanium, the upgraded magnets use niobium-tin superconducting coils. This allows them to generate magnetic fields reaching 11.3 tesla, about 40% stronger than the fields produced by the current magnets.

The new equipment will be installed around the ATLAS and CMS experiments, where the increased collision rate will be especially important.

ALICE and LHCb operate differently and pursue different physics programs, so they do not need the same increase in instantaneous luminosity. Their existing inner triplets can therefore remain in place. However, those magnets will still be upgraded so that both experiments can benefit from the overall increase in luminosity.

Removing 28 Superconducting Magnets

Since September 7, CERN teams have been dismantling sections of the collider on either side of ATLAS and CMS. The goal is to remove 28 superconducting magnets (including the inner triplets) that are scheduled to be replaced.

The operation marks the end of an era for hardware that has been part of the LHC since its construction.

“Today’s event is a major milestone for CERN, especially for the HiLumi LHC project team. The current inner triplets date back to the LHC construction phase and were installed in the machine between 2005 and 2007. After nearly twenty years of operation, they will give way to a new generation of even more powerful magnets. It’s truly remarkable to witness such a handover from one generation of innovation to the next,” says Markus Zerlauth, the HiLumi LHC Project Leader.

Share Button

NHS to suspend staff suspected of snooping on patient records

There have been too many cases of staff abusing patient trust, and enough is enough, the head of the NHS in England says.

Share Button

Earth is tearing apart beneath the Pacific Northwest

Scientists have captured an unusually detailed view of a major tectonic system beneath the Pacific Northwest beginning to come apart.

The discovery, reported in Science Advances, shows a subduction zone actively breaking into pieces. Subduction zones form where one tectonic plate is forced beneath another and pushed deep into Earth. They are responsible for some of the planet’s largest earthquakes, powerful volcanic eruptions, and long term changes to continents and ocean basins.

Until now, however, scientists have had few opportunities to see clearly how one of these enormous systems reaches the end of its life.

How a Subduction Zone Dies

Subduction is one of the main processes that continually reshapes Earth’s surface. As an oceanic plate sinks beneath another plate, material from the crust is carried downward toward the mantle, the hot layer beneath Earth’s crust.

These systems can remain active for millions of years, but they cannot continue indefinitely. Otherwise, continents would eventually pile into one another, oceans would disappear, and much of Earth’s geological history would be erased.

That leaves geologists with a fundamental question: what actually causes a mature subduction zone to stop?

“Getting a subduction zone started is like trying to push a train uphill — it takes a huge effort,” said Brandon Shuck, a geologist at Louisiana State University and lead author of the study. “But once it’s moving, it’s like the train is racing downhill, impossible to stop. Ending it requires something dramatic — basically, a train wreck.”

Scientists may now be watching that process unfold beneath Cascadia.

A Tectonic Plate Breaking Apart Beneath Cascadia

Off Vancouver Island, the Juan de Fuca and Explorer plates are slowly being forced beneath the North American plate. This area is part of the Cascadia subduction zone, a vast tectonic boundary stretching along the Pacific Northwest.

Researchers combined detailed earthquake records with seismic reflection imaging to look deep beneath the seafloor. The technique works somewhat like medical ultrasound. Scientists send sound waves into Earth and measure how those waves bounce back from different underground structures.

The seismic measurements came from the NSF funded 2021 Cascadia Seismic Imaging Experiment (CASIE21), during which researchers aboard a ship sent sound waves into the ocean floor. A 15-kilometer-long streamer carrying underwater listening instruments recorded the returning signals.

By analyzing those echoes, scientists created detailed images of structures hidden beneath the seafloor. What emerged was striking: large faults and fractures cutting through the sinking plate, including areas where the plate appears to be actively snapping apart.

“This is the first time we have a clear picture of a subduction zone caught in the act of dying,” said Shuck. “Rather than shutting down all at once, the plate is ripping apart piece by piece, creating smaller microplates and new boundaries. So instead of a big train wreck, it’s like watching a train slowly derail, one car at a time.”

A 75 Kilometer Tear Through the Plate

The researchers identified several tears running through the oceanic plate. One especially dramatic feature involves an enormous offset where part of the slab has dropped by roughly five kilometers.

“There’s a very large fault that’s actively breaking the plate,” Shuck explained. “It’s not 100% torn off yet, but it’s close.”

Earthquake activity provides another clue about what is happening.

Along a tear stretching about 75 kilometers, some portions continue to produce earthquakes while others have become unusually quiet. That difference matters because earthquakes occur when connected blocks of rock build up stress and suddenly slip.

“Once a piece has completely broken off, it no longer produces earthquakes because the rocks aren’t stuck together anymore,” he said.

The absence of earthquakes along part of the tear therefore suggests that a section of the plate has already separated. According to the researchers, that detached area is gradually expanding.

Earth’s Crust May Break Apart Piece by Piece

Rather than failing in one enormous event, the subduction zone appears to be shutting down through a series of smaller breakups.

Researchers describe the process as “episodic” or “piecewise” termination. Individual sections tear away at different times, slowly dismantling the larger tectonic system.

Transform boundaries play an important role. These are faults where sections of Earth’s crust move sideways past one another. In this setting, they can act almost like geological scissors, cutting across the plate and helping isolate individual fragments.

Once a piece becomes separated, it can form a microplate. A microplate is essentially a smaller piece of Earth’s rigid outer shell that moves somewhat independently from the major tectonic plates surrounding it.

Meanwhile, nearby portions of the larger plate can continue sinking.

As more pieces detach, the remaining plate loses some of the downward pull that keeps subduction going. Shuck compares the process to removing cars from a runaway train. Eventually, there is not enough of the system left to continue in the same way.

The breakup of each individual section can take several million years. Together, however, these episodes can eventually bring an entire subduction zone to an end.

Ancient Tectonic Mysteries Begin to Make Sense

The discovery may help explain geological puzzles seen in other parts of the world.

Scientists have found abandoned plate fragments and unusual sequences of volcanic rocks that appear to record the final stages of ancient subduction systems. Until now, researchers had evidence that these systems had broken apart, but much less direct information about how the process unfolded.

One important example can be found off Baja California.

There, geologists have identified fossil microplates left behind by the Farallon plate, an enormous ancient oceanic plate that once extended across a large portion of the eastern Pacific.

Those fragments have long suggested that the Farallon plate did not simply disappear in one event. The Cascadia observations now offer a possible explanation for how such remnants form.

Instead of collapsing all at once, a dying subduction zone may gradually unravel, leaving smaller plate fragments scattered behind as geological evidence.

Tearing Plates Could Trigger Volcanic Changes

The breakup can also change what happens deeper beneath Earth’s surface.

When a piece of a sinking plate separates, an opening called a “slab window” can form. This gap allows hotter material from the mantle to rise toward the surface.

That rising material can alter magma production and potentially contribute to episodes of volcanic activity.

As the breakup continues, tectonic boundaries can shift, additional microplates can form, and different parts of the subduction system may shut down at different times.

“It’s a progressive breakdown, one episode at a time,” said Shuck. “And it matches really well with what we see in the geologic record, where volcanic rocks get younger or older in a sequence that reflects this step-by-step tearing.”

That connection between modern observations and ancient rocks gives researchers a new way to interpret the remains of long vanished plate boundaries.

What This Means for Cascadia Earthquakes

The findings also raise an important question for the Pacific Northwest: could these newly identified tears affect future earthquakes?

Researchers now want to understand whether a large earthquake could continue rupturing across one of the breaks or whether the damaged sections of the plate might alter the path of a rupture.

A rupture is the rapid movement along a fault that produces an earthquake. The distance a rupture travels, and the structures it encounters along the way, can strongly influence the size and behavior of an earthquake.

For now, the researchers emphasize that the discovery does not significantly change Cascadia’s earthquake hazard on a human timescale.

The region is still capable of producing extremely large earthquakes and tsunamis. The breakup observed beneath the ocean is unfolding over millions of years, not decades or centuries.

However, adding these newly discovered structures to earthquake models could eventually improve scientists’ understanding of how future ruptures may behave.

For geologists, Cascadia is offering something even rarer: a chance to watch one of Earth’s great tectonic systems slowly dismantle itself, one piece at a time.

Share Button

‘A tumour the size of a football saved my life’

Lisa Carroll, 47, who was diagnosed with rare form of ovarian cancer, urges women to check symptoms.

Share Button

“We found something never seen before” – A dead star is producing a shock wave that shouldn’t exist

Stars can produce powerful shock waves when gas and dust streaming away from them collide with material in the surrounding space. Astronomers have now captured a striking example around the dead star RXJ0528+2838 using the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (ESO’s VLT).

The discovery is puzzling because, based on known mechanisms, this small stellar remnant should not be capable of producing the structure seen around it. The unexpected finding challenges current ideas about how dead stars exchange matter and energy with their surroundings.

“We found something never seen before and, more importantly, entirely unexpected,” says Simone Scaringi, associate professor at Durham University, UK and co-lead author of the study published in Nature Astronomy.

“Our observations reveal a powerful outflow that, according to our current understanding, shouldn’t be there,” says Krystian Ilkiewicz, a postdoctoral researcher at the Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center in Warsaw, Poland and study co-lead.

Astronomers use the term ‘outflow’ to describe material expelled from an object in space.

A Shock Wave Around a Dead Star

RXJ0528+2838 lies about 730 light-years from Earth. Like the Sun and other stars, it travels around the center of the Milky Way. As it moves through space, it encounters gas between the stars, producing a type of shock wave known as a bow shock.

Noel Castro Segura, research fellow at the University of Warwick in the UK and collaborator in this study, describes it as “a curved arc of material, similar to the wave that builds up in front of a ship.”

Bow shocks are typically produced when material flowing away from a star slams into its surroundings. In the case of RXJ0528+2838, however, astronomers cannot identify any known process that fully accounts for what they observed.

A White Dwarf With No Disk

RXJ0528+2838 is a white dwarf, the leftover core of a dying low-mass star, and it is orbited by a Sun-like companion.

In binary systems like this one, material can be pulled away from the companion and transferred onto the white dwarf. That material often forms a disc around the dead star. The disc feeds the white dwarf, while some matter can also be thrown back into space in powerful outflows.

RXJ0528+2838 is different. Astronomers see no evidence of such a disc, leaving them without the usual explanation for the outflow and the surrounding nebula.

“The surprise that a supposedly quiet, discless system could drive such a spectacular nebula was one of those rare ‘wow’ moments,” says Scaringi.

VLT Observations Confirm the Source

The unusual structure was first noticed in images taken with the Isaac Newton Telescope in Spain. Its strange appearance prompted the researchers to investigate it more closely using the MUSE instrument on ESO’s VLT.

“Observations with the ESO MUSE instrument allowed us to map the bow shock in detail and analyse its composition. This was crucial to confirm that the structure really originates from the binary system and not from an unrelated nebula or interstellar cloud,” Ilkiewicz explains.

The bow shock’s size and shape suggest that RXJ0528+2838 has been producing a powerful outflow for at least 1000 years.

That creates another problem. Scientists do not yet know how a dead star without a disc could sustain such an outflow for so long, although the system’s magnetic field may provide an important clue.

A Magnetic Field May Hold Part of the Answer

RXJ0528+2838 is known to possess a strong magnetic field, something the MUSE observations also confirmed.

Instead of allowing material from the companion star to settle into a disc, the magnetic field appears to guide that matter directly onto the white dwarf.

“Our finding shows that even without a disc, these systems can drive powerful outflows, revealing a mechanism we do not yet understand. This discovery challenges the standard picture of how matter moves and interacts in these extreme binary systems,” Ilkiewicz explains.

The researchers suspect that the magnetic field could be connected to a hidden source of energy, which Scaringi describes as a ‘mystery engine.’ But the explanation remains incomplete.

According to the observations, the white dwarf’s present-day magnetic field could sustain a bow shock for only a few hundred years. The structure appears to have existed for at least 1000 years, meaning the magnetic field alone cannot yet explain the full phenomenon.

Searching for the “Mystery Engine”

Astronomers will need to investigate many more binary systems to determine how these powerful outflows can form without discs.

ESO’s upcoming Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) could play an important role by allowing scientists to study both known systems and much fainter examples in greater detail.

Scaringi expects the telescope “to map more of these systems as well as fainter ones and detect similar systems in detail, ultimately helping in understanding the mysterious energy source that remains unexplained.”

Share Button

Treadmills to deadlifts: Why Gen Z are swapping cardio for strength training

Gyms are booming, solitary cardio is out – how workouts are changing.

Share Button

From weeks to hours – the rapid new test transforming brain tumour diagnosis

The test means patients can start treatment sooner and are spared weeks of uncertainty.

Share Button